History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 1569
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Weisenauer worked for American Standard from 1971 and was diagnosed with silicosis on November 26, 2007.
  • He continued working through December 2007, when the plant where he worked closed.
  • Weisenauer filed for workers’ compensation benefits on November 3, 2010, alleging disability from the occupational disease.
  • The claim was challenged as time-barred under R.C. 4123.85 by American Standard.
  • Administrative proceedings held in 2012 concluded the claim was timely under White v. Mayfield.
  • The Seneca County trial court granted summary judgment for American Standard, ruling the claim time-barred; the appellate court reversed and remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the claim was timely under 4123.85 Weisenauer contends White v. Mayfield controls and renders timely. American Standard argues the White framework and the record show time-barred. Not time-barred; White timing applies; remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • White v. Mayfield, 37 Ohio St.3d 11 (1988) (disability date begins the limitations period; three-part White test)
  • Heard v. Conrad, 138 Ohio App.3d 503 (7th Dist.2000) (default to later White date when third element uncertain)
  • Davis v. Taylor & Bogus Foundry, 2003-Ohio-1832 (8th Dist.) (rejects automatic default when third date uncertain)
  • DesMarais v. Strauss & Troy, 121 Ohio App.3d 125 (1st Dist.1997) (supports reading White to award timely filing when third date unattainable)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Weisenauer v. Am. Standard, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 14, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 1569; 13-13-25
Docket Number: 13-13-25
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Weisenauer v. Am. Standard, Inc., 2014 Ohio 1569