Watson v. State
328 Ga. App. 832
Ga. Ct. App.2014Background
- Watson was convicted by a jury of two counts of felony obstruction of a law enforcement officer; the trial court denied his motion for a new trial.
- On appeal, Watson challenges (1) the trial court’s denial of his written request to charge misdemeanor obstruction as a lesser included offense, and (2) the exclusion of evidence that he had previously been the victim of a home invasion to support an affirmative defense of defense of habitation.
- The State alleged Watson obstructed the officers by “offering violence” by grabbing pepper spray and reaching toward another weapon during the arrest of Watson’s girlfriend in their apartment.
- The events occurred May 4, 2012, when detectives serving an arrest warrant entered the apartment; Watson allegedly grabbed pepper spray and resisted, leading to a struggle and discovery of a hammer near the couch.
- Evidence at trial included the detectives’ testimony and Watson’s version that he did not know the men were officers and that he was defending his girlfriend; Watson’s girlfriend supported some versions of Watson’s conduct.
- The court ultimately affirmed the conviction, rejecting both challenges to the trial strategy and evidentiary rulings.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether misdemeanor obstruction should have been charged as a lesser included offense | Watson: misdemeanor obstruction warranted if evidence supports it | Watson: offense could be charged if evidence supports lesser offense | No; evidence showed either felony obstruction or no offense, so no misdemeanor charge warranted. |
| Whether excluding evidence of a prior home invasion was error to support defense of habitation | Watson: prior home invasion evidence is admissible to support defense | State: evidence inadmissible to support justification defense | No error; admissibility of third-party violence to support justification defense is properly limited. |
Key Cases Cited
- Jones v. State, 276 Ga. App. 66 (2005) (defines misdemeanor obstruction elements and knowledge requirement)
- Reddick v. State, 298 Ga. App. 155 (2009) (knowledge that target is a law enforcement officer required for misdemeanor obstruction)
- Mangum v. State, 228 Ga. App. 545 (1997) (clarifies elements of obstruction)
- White v. State, 310 Ga. App. 386 (2011) (misdemeanor obstruction not charged where felony or no offense shown)
- Strickland v. State, 223 Ga. App. 772 (1996) (cannot instruct on lesser offense when only completed offense or none is supported)
- Bellamy v. State, 324 Ga. App. 319 (2013) (reaffirmed approach to lesser included offenses)
- Lindsey v. State, 262 Ga. 665 (1993) (reckless conduct instruction not appropriate when offense is justified or not committed)
- Ewumi v. State, 315 Ga. App. 656 (2012) (misapplied misapprehension of fact defense principle)
- O’Connell v. State, 294 Ga. 379 (2014) (inadmissibility of violence against third party to support justification)
- Harris v. State, 279 Ga. 304 (2005) (limits on using prior violent acts to justify defense)
- Bryant v. State, 271 Ga. 99 (1999) (justification defenses require objective standard of reasonableness)
- G. Stinkard, v. State, 259 Ga. App. 755 (2003) (indictment showing multiple ways allows proof in any one method)
