History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waterview Site Service, Inc. v. Pay Day, Inc.
2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 565
Conn. App. Ct.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Waterview Site Services, Inc. (plaintiff) sues Pay Day, Inc. (defendant) over a disputed site on a vacant lot at 575 Asylum Street, Bridgeport.
  • Plaintiff, a general contractor partial owner, performed extensive site work as part of a long-running relationship with DiNardo and DeVito, the defendant’s corporate principals.
  • Plaintiff invoiced $269,868.79 for site work; defendant allegedly paid some subcontractors and disputes the basis of liability for that work.
  • Plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien on October 7, 2004 in the amount of $269,868.79 and later sued for foreclosure and unjust enrichment.
  • The trial court found consent for lien purposes, awarded $224,959.24 for unjust enrichment (after subtracting $36,000 for fair rental value), and foreclosed the lien; defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals to adjust the setoff.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Consent to the work for mechanic’s lien Waterview proved consent to liability under § 49-33 No meeting of the minds; no implied contract supporting lien Consent found; lien foreclosure affirmed
Timeliness of the mechanic’s lien filing Lien timeliness should follow last date of services Record insufficient to determine last service date Record inadequate; timeliness cannot be reviewed on appeal
Unjust enrichment award amount Plaintiff conferred value; invoices support amount Limitations or valuation unclear; cost accounting disputed Not clearly erroneous; substantial evidence supports $224,959.24
Cross-appeal: setoff for fair rental value No setoff pleaded; unjust enrichment should not deduct rent Equitable setoff permitted; fair rental value should reduce recovery Fair rental value properly deducted as an equitable offset; affirmed award net of rent

Key Cases Cited

  • St. Catherine’s Church Corp. v. Technical Planning Associates, Inc., 9 Conn. App. 682 (Conn. App. 1987) (consent required for mechanic’s lien is broader than mere knowledge)
  • 36 DeForest Avenue, LLC v. Creadore, 99 Conn. App. 690 (Conn. App. 2007) (timing of filing depends on completion; exception for substantial completion)
  • Shapero v. Mercede, 77 Conn. App. 497 (Conn. App. 2003) (trial court may reduce damages in quantum meruit even absent setoff pleadings)
  • Data-Flow Technologies, LLC v. Harte Nissan, Inc., 111 Conn. App. 118 (Conn. App. 2008) (value of labor may be relied upon when benefits are difficult to measure)
  • Gardner v. Piloto, 68 Conn. App. 448 (Conn. App. 2002) (evidence supporting unjust enrichment valuation may be accepted)
  • Polverari v. Peatt, 29 Conn. App. 191 (Conn. App. 1992) (broad discretion in balancing equities for unjust enrichment)
  • National CSS, Inc. v. Stamford, 195 Conn. 587 (Conn. 1985) (equitable remedies balanced against defendant’s benefit)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Waterview Site Service, Inc. v. Pay Day, Inc.
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Dec 21, 2010
Citation: 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 565
Docket Number: AC 30982
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.