History
  • No items yet
midpage
177 So. 3d 1167
Ala.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • ASMC administers ASMCRA and has its principal office in Walker County; Board operates a raw-water facility in Jefferson County downstream of the mine permit.
  • Shepherd Bend obtained a Walker County-anchored surface-mining permit; Board challenged the permit and pursued judicial review after exhausting administrative remedies.
  • Board sought circuit-court review in Jefferson County; ASMC moved to dismiss or transfer for venue or forum non conveniens, joined by Shepherd Bend.
  • Circuit court transferred the action to Walker County, citing § 41-22-20(b) and the lack of venue in Jefferson County under applicable venue rules.
  • Board petitioned for mandamus to vacate the transfer order; this Court granted the petition and issued the writ.
  • The core issue is whether Jefferson County is a proper venue for review under ASMCRA, given the absence of a venue provision in ASMCRA and the applicability of AAPA § 41-22-20(b).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Jefferson County is proper venue for review. Board argues Jefferson County proper under § 41-22-20(b). ASMC/Shepherd Bend rely on nearness to headquarters and ASMCRA priority over AAPA; venue default to Walker County. Jefferson County is proper venue under § 41-22-20(b); ASMCRA controls and AAPA venue provisions do not apply to this appeal.
Whether the circuit court should transfer to Walker County under forum non conveniens. Board would prefer Walker County as convenient and justice-friendly. Transfer based on forum non conveniens should be considered if venue is proper; circuit court already transferred on venue grounds. The Court declines to rule on forum non conveniens here; transfer based on that doctrine was not the basis for mandamus relief because venue was improper in Jefferson County on the circuit court’s order.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ex parte Worley, 46 So.3d 916 (Ala. 2009) (provides procedure for judicial review of agency decisions within Alabama)
  • Ex parte Neely, 653 So.2d 945 (Ala. 1995) (venue rule for state agency actions absent contrary statute)
  • Alabama Youth Services Board v. Ellis, 350 So.2d 405 (Ala. 1977) (agency-venue rules for state agencies)
  • Ex parte Water Works Bd. of Birmingham, 156 So.3d 412 (Ala.Civ.App.2014) (appeal jurisdiction and venue considerations for ASMC-related review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Water Works Board of Birmingham v. Alabama Surface Mining Commission
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Dec 19, 2014
Citations: 177 So. 3d 1167; 2014 WL 7234922; 2014 Ala. LEXIS 204; 1131094
Docket Number: 1131094
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In