Warfield v. Horton
2:21-cv-10463
E.D. Mich.Mar 11, 2025Background
- LaMichael Warfield was convicted in Michigan state court of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, kidnapping, and related offenses for a violent incident involving another inmate at Macomb County Jail.
- Warfield was sentenced as a fourth-time habitual felony offender to 25–50 years in prison in 2018.
- Warfield challenged his convictions in the Michigan Court of Appeals on grounds including insufficient evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, evidentiary rulings, denial of a speedy trial, and sentencing errors. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
- He attempted to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court, but his application was rejected as untimely, even after accounting for extensions due to COVID-19.
- Warfield then filed a federal habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, raising the same five claims from his direct appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedural default due to untimely appeal | COVID caused late filing; delay should be excused | Procedural rules enforced; Warfield's claims defaulted | Claims procedurally defaulted and barred |
| Sufficiency of evidence and trial errors | Evidence was insufficient; various trial errors impacted outcome | Claims not reviewable due to procedural default | Court barred from reviewing on merits |
| Cause & prejudice for excusing default | Cites COVID pandemic as cause | No specific showing of how COVID prevented filing | No sufficient cause or prejudice shown |
| Actual innocence exception to default | (Did not present new evidence; relied on assertions) | No plausible claim; no new reliable evidence presented | Actual innocence argument rejected |
Key Cases Cited
- Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991) (federal habeas review barred where procedural default occurs due to failure to follow state rules)
- Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478 (1986) (actual innocence may excuse procedural default only with new reliable evidence)
- Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995) (actual innocence exception requires credible new evidence of innocence)
