History
  • No items yet
midpage
263 P.3d 231
Nev.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Walters personally guaranteed a $15,250,000 nonrecourse loan for Stallion Mountain Golf Course and waived the one-action rule in his guaranty.
  • Foreclosure sale of Stallion Mountain occurred on December 8, 2008, with CBN purchasing the property for $5 million.
  • Walters sued in May 2008 for declaratory relief and breach of the implied covenant; CBN answered with counterclaims in September 2008.
  • In April 2009, CBN asserted a breach of guaranty and sought a deficiency against Walters; CBN also pursued a cross-claim for the deficiency against the Borrowers.
  • CBN moved for summary judgment in June 2009 on the breach of guaranty; Walters argued the six-month deficiency-application deadline had expired and raised anti-deficiency defenses.
  • The district court held CBN’s counterclaim and motion satisfied NRS Chapter 40’s deficiency-application requirements and scheduled a hearing to determine the deficiency, later; the matter is now reviewed by the Nevada Supreme Court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the deficiency-application requirement was met. Walters Walters CBN complied; the motion served as the deficiency application
Whether waivers of anti-deficiency rules affect the deficiency application and potential double recovery. Walters CBN Waiver does not bar deficiency relief; no double recovery issue required

Key Cases Cited

  • McDonald v. D.P. Alexander, 121 Nev. 812, 123 P.3d 748 (2005) (one-action rule aims to prevent double recovery of debt and collateral)
  • Bonicamp v. Vazquez, 120 Nev. 377, 91 P.3d 584 (2004) (one-action rule prohibits double recovery against debtor)
  • Madera v. SIIS, 114 Nev. 253, 956 P.2d 117 (1998) (plain-language statutory interpretation governs outcome)
  • International Game Tech. v. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 179 P.3d 556 (2008) (de novo review for statutory interpretation in writ matters)
  • Smith v. District Court (1991), 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991) (writs require a plain, speedy, adequate remedy in law)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Walters v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 13, 2011
Citations: 263 P.3d 231; 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 66; 2011 Nev. LEXIS 82; 127 Nev. 723; 55912
Docket Number: 55912
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
Log In
    Walters v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark, 263 P.3d 231