368 S.W.3d 224
Mo. Ct. App.2012Background
- Walley and her husband sued La Plata Volunteer Fire Department, City of La Plata, La Plata Rural Fire Protection Association, and employees for injuries from a March 4, 2001 automobile accident.
- Walley was a Missouri State Highway Patrol Trooper responding to an emergency when the crash occurred.
- Walley drove at high speed up a hill with no warning, cresting into Mock’s vehicle, causing injuries and medical expenses of about $222,426, plus claimed economic losses.
- Defendants contested causation and damages; experts disputed extent of injuries and ability to work.
- At trial, Walley’s comparative fault was submitted to the jury over her objections based on official immunity and Mock’s release.
- The jury apportioned 90% fault to Walley and 10% to La Plata, awarding $800,000 in damages to Walley.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official immunity and comparative fault | Walley: official immunity bars comparative fault against her as plaintiff; release by Mock absent binding effect. | La Plata: official immunity does not bar comparative fault here; Mock’s release does not bind La Plata, nor waive Walley’s fault. | Official immunity does not shield Walley from comparative fault as plaintiff; release does not bind La Plata; instruction proper. |
| Admission of Walley's speed on Highway 63 | Evidence of prior speed was irrelevant or prejudicial and should have been excluded. | Evidence was admissible to provide a complete picture of events leading to the accident and Walley’s conduct. | Admissible; any error was not prejudicial; no reversal required. |
Key Cases Cited
- Southers v. City of Farmington, 263 S.W.3d 603 (Mo. banc 2008) (official immunity protects discretionary acts during emergencies)
- Davis v. Lambert-St. Louis Intl. Airport, 193 S.W.3d 760 (Mo. banc 2006) (official immunity does not preclude negligent conduct analysis)
- Kanagawa v. State, 685 S.W.2d 831 (Mo. banc 1985) (official immunity doctrine described)
- Missouri Highway and Transp. Comm’n v. Kansas City Cold Storage, Inc., 948 S.W.2d 679 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997) (sovereign immunity and comparative fault where state sues private party)
- Stapleton v. Griewe, 602 S.W.2d 810 (Mo. App. W.D. 1980) (remoteness and continuity in prior-speed evidence)
- Legere, 706 S.W.2d 560 (Mo. App. S.D. 1986) (continuity in vehicle speed evidence considerations)
- State v. Rios, 314 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010) (evidentiary relevance standards)
- Nelson v. Waxman, 9 S.W.3d 601 (Mo. banc 2000) (trial court evidentiary discretion and prejudice standard)
- Mid Rivers Mall, L.L.C. v. McManmon, 37 S.W.3d 253 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000) (parol evidence rules and contract interpretation principles)
- Estate of Gross v. Gross, 840 S.W.2d 253 (Mo. App. W.D. 1992) (preservation of evidentiary objections and prejudice required)
