History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
20-1101
| Fed. Cl. | May 6, 2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Maureena Walker filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after a September 10, 2019 influenza vaccination.
  • A proffer by Respondent resulted in a decision awarding compensation on December 13, 2021.
  • Walker moved for attorney’s fees and costs on February 3, 2022, seeking $22,397.23 ($21,485.20 in fees; $912.03 in costs) and certified no out-of-pocket expenses.
  • Respondent did not contest entitlement to fees/costs and deferred to the Court on the amount.
  • The Chief Special Master reviewed billing and awarded fees and costs in full except for a minor reduction: paralegal hourly rate reduced from $181 to the Program maximum $177 for 2022, reducing fees by $0.40.
  • Final award: $22,396.83 total (fees $21,484.80; costs $912.03), payable jointly to petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Walker's Argument Respondent's Argument Held
Entitlement to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs under the Vaccine Act Walker sought statutory fees/costs following successful proffered claim Respondent agreed statutory requirements met and deferred amount to Court Awarded fees and costs (statutory entitlement satisfied)
Reasonableness of requested attorney hourly rates (2019–2022) Requested specific rates for attorneys, including increases for 2022 Respondent did not object to rate amounts Attorney rates for 2019–2021 upheld; 2022 increases for named attorneys awarded
Paralegal hourly rate for 2022 Requested $181/hr Program rate schedule caps paralegal rates; Respondent did not contest amount but Court applies schedule Reduced paralegal rate to $177/hr (Program maximum), lowering fees by $0.40
Requested litigation costs (medical records, shipping, filing) Sought $912.03 in costs Respondent did not dispute costs Costs found reasonable and awarded in full

Key Cases Cited

  • Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (2008) (fee requests must include contemporaneous, specific billing records)
  • Saxton v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 3 F.3d 1517 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (special master may reduce hours to a reasonable number)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983) (hours that are excessive, redundant, or unnecessary should be excluded)
  • Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201 (2009) (special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte)
  • Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719 (2011) (special master need not perform line-by-line reductions)
  • Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482 (1991) (petitioner bears burden to establish hours, rates, and expenses requested)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: May 6, 2022
Docket Number: 20-1101
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.