History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker-Butler v. Berryhill
857 F.3d 1
| 1st Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Walker-Butler applied for Title II disability benefits; ALJ initially denied, Appeals Council denied, and she sought judicial review in district court. The district court remanded her claim for further administrative proceedings in December 2014.
  • On remand the ALJ issued a partially favorable decision dated August 27, 2015, and mailed notice to Walker-Butler; the notice explained the decision would become final 61 days after the notice unless she filed written exceptions or the Appeals Council assumed jurisdiction.
  • Walker-Butler filed no written exceptions; the Appeals Council did not assume jurisdiction, so under 20 C.F.R. §404.984(c) the ALJ’s decision became the Commissioner’s final decision when the Appeals Council’s 60-day window expired.
  • Walker-Butler filed a federal complaint on January 4, 2016; the Commissioner moved to dismiss as untimely, calculating the 60-day filing period under 42 U.S.C. §405(g) expired December 28, 2015 (a Monday) after accounting for the weekend.
  • Walker-Butler argued 20 C.F.R. §422.210(c)’s five-day presumption of receipt (used on initial Appeals Council notices) delayed finality and thus her filing was timely; the district court rejected that argument and dismissed for untimeliness.
  • The First Circuit considered whether §422.210(c)’s five-day presumption applies to final decisions on remand when no written exceptions are filed and the Appeals Council does not assume jurisdiction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the 5-day receipt presumption in 20 C.F.R. §422.210(c) applies to final decisions on remand where no written exceptions are filed and the Appeals Council declines to assume jurisdiction Walker-Butler: §422.210(c) should apply to the ALJ’s notice on remand, presuming receipt 5 days later and thereby extending the deadlines so her Jan 4, 2016 filing is timely Commissioner: §422.210(c) applies only to Appeals Council actions on initial decisions; on remand finality is governed by §404.984(c) and the 60-day clock runs from the date the ALJ’s decision becomes final after the Appeals Council’s 60-day window The 5-day presumption does not apply on remand in cases without written exceptions; affirming dismissal as untimely

Key Cases Cited

  • Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467 (equitable tolling of social security filing period acknowledged)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Walker-Butler v. Berryhill
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: May 12, 2017
Citation: 857 F.3d 1
Docket Number: 16-1944P
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.