392 S.W.3d 426
Ky. Ct. App.2013Background
- Kris Wahlke appeals multiple orders (Oct. 8, 2010; Oct. 11, 2010; Mar. 17, 2011; Dec. 2, 2011) granting Kristen Corrigan relocation to Texas and denying Kris’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
- Kris and Kristen married in 2000; child born 2006; dissolution decree awarded Kristen sole custody with Kris visitation.
- Prior to the decree, Kris and Kristen (and child) moved from Kentucky to Ohio; neither parent nor child resided in Kentucky at the dissolution.
- Kristen filed June 18, 2010 to relocate with the child to Abilene, Texas and to modify Kris’s visitation.
- The family court granted relocation, Kris moved to reconsider and moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and the court denied the motion.
- The appellate court reverses, holds the Kentucky court lacked exclusive continuing jurisdiction under the UCCJEA because the parties and child no longer resided in Kentucky; remands for proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the court had exclusive continuing jurisdiction to modify custody under UCCJEA/KRS 403.824(1). | Kris contends no exclusive continuing jurisdiction due to relocation and absence. | Corrigan contends substantial connection/preceding Kentucky proceedings sustain jurisdiction. | No; court misinterpreted statute and lacked exclusive continuing jurisdiction. |
Key Cases Cited
- Anderson v. Johnson, 350 S.W.3d 453 (Ky. 2011) (recognizes visitation terminology and relocation context in custody cases)
- Pennington v. Marcum, 266 S.W.3d 759 (Ky. 2008) (modification/visitation considerations under UCCJEA)
- Cann v. Howard, 850 S.W.2d 57 (Ky.App. 1993) (subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived by estoppel)
- Dillard v. Dillard, 859 S.W.2d 134 (Ky.App. 1993) (UCCJEA jurisdiction framework in multi-state custody disputes)
- Old Lewis Hunter Distillery Co. v. Ky. Tax Comm'n, 302 Ky. 68, 193 S.W.2d 464 (1945) (statutory interpretation controls legislative intent)
