History
  • No items yet
midpage
Villardo D. Dullas v. Office of Personnel Management
|
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Villardo D. Dullas sought a CSRS annuity; OPM denied his request and the MSPB administrative judge upheld OPM’s reconsideration decision.
  • Appellant’s federal service included numerous temporary appointments from Aug 1971–Jan 1980 (appointments limited to 1 year or less) and an indefinite excepted‑service position from Jan 1980–Jul 1992.
  • Appellant did not make CSRS contributions for much of the disputed period and argued he was nonetheless covered for service between 1971 and 1982.
  • He relied on 5 C.F.R. § 831.303(a), contending it retroactively made such service covered for CSRS purposes (i.e., converted creditable service into covered service).
  • The administrative judge found the appellant failed to prove entitlement to a CSRS annuity because his service was noncovered under CSRS exclusion rules.
  • MSPB denied the petition for review and affirmed the initial decision; appellant was notified of appeal rights to the Federal Circuit.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether appellant’s 1971–1982 service is CSRS covered service § 831.303(a) makes service between 1920–1982 creditable and thus effectively covered Appellant’s service was excluded from CSRS because it consisted of temporary appointments and indefinite excepted‑service positions MSPB: § 831.303(a) addresses creditable service only; it does not convert noncovered service into CSRS covered service; claim denied
Whether failure to contribute to CSRS can be excused if service is retroactively covered Appellant implied coverage exists regardless of contributions OPM/MSPB: Coverage requires status as covered employee and contribution obligations; noncoverage exclusions control eligibility MSPB: Nonpayment of contributions irrelevant once service is noncovered; appellant not entitled to annuity
Applicability of exclusions for appointments <=1 year and indefinite excepted service Appellant argued regulation creates automatic coverage Agency: 5 C.F.R. § 831.201 exclusions apply to such appointments MSPB: Service under appointments limited to 1 year and indefinite excepted employees are excluded from CSRS coverage
Whether administrative judge erred in law or fact Appellant claimed misinterpretation of § 831.303(a) Agency defended administrative decision as correct application of CSRS rules MSPB: No basis to grant review; initial decision affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Encarnado v. Office of Personnel Management, 116 M.S.P.R. 301 (M.S.P.B. 2011) (distinguishes creditable service from CSRS covered service and recognizes exclusions for temporary/excepted appointments)
  • Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (court enforces statutory filing deadlines for appeals to the Federal Circuit)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Villardo D. Dullas v. Office of Personnel Management
Court Name: Merit Systems Protection Board
Date Published: Dec 28, 2016
Court Abbreviation: MSPB