History
  • No items yet
midpage
Villafane v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-1156
| Fed. Cl. | Sep 29, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Allison Villafane filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging SIRVA after a Tdap vaccination on November 1, 2014.
  • The parties filed a joint stipulation; on August 31, 2016 the Chief Special Master awarded compensation per that stipulation.
  • On November 30, 2016 Petitioner moved for attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $16,068.88 ($14,801.50 in fees; $1,267.38 in costs).
  • Respondent filed a response noting that the Vaccine Act and Vaccine Rule 13 do not give Respondent a role in fee resolution but stated the statutory requirements for a fee award were met and deferred to the Special Master’s discretion.
  • The Special Master reviewed counsel’s billing records, found the request reasonable, and awarded the full requested amount as a lump sum payable jointly to Petitioner and counsel.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the requested attorneys’ fees and costs are reasonable and should be awarded in full Requested $14,801.50 in fees and $1,267.38 in costs as reasonable for services and expenses incurred Respondent stated no role in fee resolution but agreed statutory prerequisites were met and recommended Special Master exercise discretion to determine a reasonable award Special Master found the request reasonable, made no reductions, and awarded the full $16,068.88 as a lump sum payable to petitioner and counsel

Key Cases Cited

  • Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney may not charge or collect fees in addition to the amount awarded under the Vaccine Act)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Villafane v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Sep 29, 2017
Docket Number: 15-1156
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.