midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
392 S.W.3d 892
Ark. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Lisa Sutton agreed to sell Treece property (33 acres, house, two barns) to Danny Victory, his wife Sandra, and son Joshua for $60,000 in March 2008.
  • Danny recorded a special warranty deed in April 2008 without signing the accompanying promissory note and mortgage.
  • An lis pendens filed March 14, 2008, against the property created a title cloud.
  • Lisa sued in April 2010 to rescind the deed based on alleged fraud; the Victorys counterclaimed for specific performance or damages.
  • Trial court (June 17, 2011) rescinded the deed, dismissed the counterclaim, and awarded Lisa attorney fees under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308.
  • On appeal, the court held the trial court erred as a matter of law in supporting rescission for fraud; reversed and remanded with directions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there clear and convincing fraud to support rescission? Sutton Victorys No clear and convincing fraud; judgment reversed
Did the trial court properly dismiss the counterclaim for specific performance/damages? Sutton Victorys Error; counterclaim properly remanded
Was the attorney-fee award proper given rescission was reversed? Sutton Victorys Attorney-fee award reversed with rescission

Key Cases Cited

  • Hearne v. Banks, 2009 Ark. App. 590, 376 S.W.3d 444 (Ark. App. 2009) (fraud elements; standard of review for setting aside a deed)
  • Se. Distrib. Co. v. Miller Brewing Co., 366 Ark. 560, 237 S.W.3d 63 (Ark. 2006) (fraud claims require misrepresentation of past/present facts; cannot rely on projections)
  • S. Cnty., Inc. v. First W. Loan Co., 315 Ark. 722, 871 S.W.2d 325 (Ark. 1994) (fraud elements and proof standards)
  • Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Davis, 347 Ark. 566, 66 S.W.3d 568 (Ark. 2002) (fraud proof standards and reliance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Victory v. Smith
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Feb 22, 2012
Citations: 392 S.W.3d 892; 2012 WL 556490; 2012 Ark. App. LEXIS 267; 2012 Ark. App. 168; No. CA 11-928
Docket Number: No. CA 11-928
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
Log In
    Victory v. Smith, 392 S.W.3d 892