History
  • No items yet
midpage
ViaView, Inc. v. Chanson
2:12-cv-01657
D. Nev.
Nov 30, 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • ViaView filed ex parte TRO and PI in NV district court over ISANYONEUP domain rights and alleged infringement.
  • Defendants operate infringing domains isanyoneup.net, isanyoneupnudes.com, isanyoneupvideos.com distributing involuntary pornography.
  • Plaintiff owns ISANYONEUP mark, purchased domain and rights in April 2012, tying mark to anti-bullying campaign.
  • Defendants allegedly use the ISANYONEUP name to direct traffic to their sites, harming Plaintiff’s brand.
  • Court granted TRO and required registration/transfer actions to preserve status quo pending PI hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Likelihood of success on the merits Plaintiff will likely prove cybersquatting under ACPA Chanson argues insufficient to show trademark ownership or bad faith Plaintiff likely succeeds on ACPA claim.
Irreparable harm absent relief Irreparable harm from ongoing infringement and diversion Harm to Defendants minimal; sites remain functional Irreparable harm presumed due to likelihood of success.
Balance of equities TRO prevents brand tarnish and consumer confusion TRO imposes minimal burden on Defendants Equities favor Plaintiff.
Public interest Prevents consumer confusion and protects mark integrity No significant public detriment shown Public interest favors TRO.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bosley Med. Inst., Inc. v. Kremer, 403 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2005) (cybersquatting framework and bad-faith intent factors)
  • DaimlerChrysler v. The Net Inc., 388 F.3d 201 (6th Cir. 2004) (domain-name cybersquatting analysis)
  • Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992) (distinctiveness doctrine for marks)
  • Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385 (9th Cir. 1993) (inherent distinctiveness/arbitrary marks)
  • Interstellar Starship Servs., Ltd v. Epix, Inc., 304 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2002) (concept of inherently distinctive marks)
  • Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Moose Creek, Inc., 486 F.3d 629 (9th Cir. 2007) (irreparable harm and likelihood of success linkage)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) (four-factor test for preliminary injunctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: ViaView, Inc. v. Chanson
Court Name: District Court, D. Nevada
Date Published: Nov 30, 2012
Docket Number: 2:12-cv-01657
Court Abbreviation: D. Nev.