History
  • No items yet
midpage
Vaughn v. Vaughn
2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 155
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Clay County Chancery Court granted Terri W. and Craig Vaughn a divorce, awarded custody to Terri, and ordered Craig to pay child support.
  • Craig appeals, challenging denial of his motion to compel discovery and the division of the marital home.
  • Craig propounded interrogatories and admissions on Jan 30, 2009; sought a continuance; trial was continued to March 16 and then March 23, 2009.
  • Motion to compel was filed Mar 20, 2009; chancellor denied it on March 23 after advising fair trial would proceed if prejudice appeared.
  • Court applied discretionary discovery standards, reasonable notice, and due process considerations, citing Boutwell and related authorities.
  • Chancellor divided marital assets using Ferguson factors, equitably splitting the home equity, with Craig receiving slightly more than 50% in total.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether denial of discovery was error Craig Terri No reversible error; no abuse of discretion; insufficient prejudice shown.
Procedural due process in discovery denial Craig Terri No procedural due process violation; fair hearing proceeded.
Substantive due process in custody rights Craig Terri Troxel does not apply to natural parents; no substantive violation.
Lawfulness of marital home division under Ferguson factors Craig Terri Equitable division affirmed; 50/50 equity split with corresponding debt treatment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Boutwell v. Boutwell, 829 So.2d 1216 (Miss. 2002) (no abuse of discretion for late discovery where notice was insufficient)
  • City of Jackson v. Presley, 942 So.2d 777 (Miss. 2006) (trial court broad discretion in pretrial discovery)
  • Marshall v. Burger King, 2 So.3d 702 (Miss.Ct.App. 2008) (discovery remedies within trial court discretion)
  • Edmonds v. Williamson, 13 So.3d 1283 (Miss. 2009) (abuse of discretion standard for discovery rulings)
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000) (parents' custody rights; Troxel not controlling here)
  • Mabus v. Mabus, 847 So.2d 815 (Miss. 2003) (Troxel applicability limited in custody disputes)
  • Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921 (Miss. 1994) (Ferguson factors for equitable distribution)
  • Hults v. Hults, 11 So.3d 1273 (Miss.Ct.App. 2009) (reaffirmation of Ferguson factors and domestic equity)
  • Goellner v. Goellner, 11 So.3d 1251 (Miss.Ct.App. 2009) (review of Ferguson-based division of property)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Vaughn v. Vaughn
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Mar 22, 2011
Citation: 2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 155
Docket Number: No. 2009-CA-00915-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.