History
  • No items yet
midpage
Valley Health System, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark
127 Nev. 167
| Nev. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Valley Health petitioned for a writ of mandamus to overturn a district court order granting discovery of documents.
  • The discovery sought records of other incidents or complaints of improper conduct by employees at Centennial Hills and other Valley Health facilities.
  • The discovery commissioner recommended production for five years prior to the alleged sexual assault.
  • Valley Health objected, arguing irrelevance and privilege under NRS 439.875; district court adopted the commissioner's report.
  • Valley Health raised the privilege argument for the first time before the district court; this was later deemed waived for purposes of the opinion.
  • The court ultimately denied the writ, finding the privilege argument not waived as to merits and that the requested materials were not privileged under NRS 439.875(5).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Waiver for privilege issue. Valley Health waived privilege by not raising before commissioner. Waiver rule applies; issue not presented to commissioner. Waiver apply; privilege argument not preserved.
Scope of NRS 439.875(5) privilege. Records of patient safety committee should be privileged. Privilege limited to patient safety committee records. Privilege limited to internal patient safety committee materials; not to Cagnina's requested documents.
Appropriateness of writ relief for discovery orders. Writ warranted to prevent privilege disclosure and misuse. Writ typically unavailable for discovery; only in limited cases. Writ denied on the merits; discovery not privileged.

Key Cases Cited

  • Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Dist. Ct., 113 Nev. 521 (Nev. 1997) (scope of NRS 49.265 privilege is narrow; occurrence reports not protected)
  • Wardleigh v. District Court, 111 Nev. 345 (Nev. 1995) (discovery orders; writs are extraordinary relief in limited circumstances)
  • Clark County Liquor v. Clark, 102 Nev. 654 (Nev. 1986) (discovery abuses; when writs may issue)
  • Clark v. District Court, 101 Nev. 58 (Nev. 1985) (limits on discovery relief; writ considerations)
  • Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49 (Nev. 1981) (waiver when issues not urged in trial court)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Valley Health System, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: May 6, 2011
Citation: 127 Nev. 167
Docket Number: 56239
Court Abbreviation: Nev.