History
  • No items yet
midpage
UUSI, LLC v. United States
1:12-cv-00216
| Fed. Cl. | Apr 25, 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Uusi, LLC and OLDNAR Corporation hold patents relating to Humvee engine starting systems.
  • OLDNAR assigned five related patents to Uusi between 1994 and 2000.
  • KDS, GHSP, AM General supplied or used engine starting systems in Government Humvees, with possible indemnification obligations.
  • Government moved to notice third parties AM General and GHSP under Rule 14(b) to protect indemnification interests.
  • Plaintiffs moved to dismiss third parties or challenge their pleadings, arguing Rule 14 was undermined after repeal of 41 U.S.C. § 114.
  • Court held Rule 14 remains viable, subject-matter jurisdiction exists, and third parties properly participated under Rule 14.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Rule 14 jurisdiction after repeal Rule 14 invalid after §114 repeal; no jurisdiction for third parties. Rule 14 remains independent; third parties have interests and can be noticed. Rule 14 remains viable; jurisdiction not implicated by third-party notice.
Effect of Rule 14 on third-party standing Third parties need a third-party plaintiff to invoke jurisdiction; improper pleadings. Notice and appearance confer standing to protect indemnification interests. Third parties have standing via Rule 14 and their answers; no jurisdictional defects.
Whether third-party notices create new claims Answers to notice create claims between plaintiffs and third parties improperly. Answers protect interests; no new claims against plaintiffs created. No new claims; participation is to protect indemnification interests.
Indemnification interests as basis for participation Indemnification issues do not justify third-party participation. AM General and GHSP have indemnification obligations and related interests warrant notice. Interests sufficiently established; third parties properly joined.

Key Cases Cited

  • Advanced Software Design Corp. v. Fed. Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 583 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (exclusive jurisdiction under 1498; standards for pleading)
  • Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 534 F.2d 889 (Ct. Cl. 1976) (court authority over patent infringement against government)
  • Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 223 (2004) (distinction between notice and jurisdiction in Rule 14)
  • Bowser, Inc. v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 441 (1970) (third-party indemnitor may participate to protect interests)
  • USHIP Intellectual Props., LLC, 98 Fed. Cl. 396 (2011) (third party filed an Answer; standing to seek adjudication)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: UUSI, LLC v. United States
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Apr 25, 2013
Docket Number: 1:12-cv-00216
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.