midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
974 N.W.2d 360
N.D.
2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Parties married in 2005, separated in 2019; one minor child; April has primary residential responsibility.
  • April was a long-term stay-at-home parent; post-separation she works part-time in retail (~$16/hr).
  • Bryon formerly worked as an oil-and-gas consultant, was laid off, and currently works at a parts store (~$16/hr) in Wyoming.
  • District Court found Bryon underemployed, imputed income of $246,864 (90% of his highest consecutive 12-month earnings) and set child support at $2,308/month.
  • Court awarded April the full proceeds (~$31,000) from sale of the marital home and did not award spousal support.
  • Judgment omitted a child support commencement date; on appeal the parties agreed it should begin April 1, 2020, and the Court modified the judgment accordingly.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court properly imputed income to Bryon for child support under ND Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-07(3) April: impute 90% of Bryon’s highest 12-month earnings ($246,864) to reflect earning capacity Bryon: industry downturn makes comparable oilfield work unavailable; the § 75-02-04.1-07(5) exception should apply; his actual current income ($31,200) should be used Affirmed. Court properly imputed $246,864; Bryon failed to prove the unavailability exception (no evidence of local job availability or job-search/pay-range data)
Whether the property/debt division (award of home-sale proceeds to April) was equitable April: limited earning capacity and custodial status justify awarding proceeds to her Bryon: proceeds should be split equally; court failed to apply Ruff-Fischer factors or explain rationale Affirmed. Court considered Ruff-Fischer factors (ages, earning ability, marriage duration, financial circumstances) and reasonably awarded proceeds to April given her limited earning capacity and absence of spousal support
Whether omission of a child support commencement date was reversible error April: court should set a commencement date Bryon: did not prevail on contest; parties agreed on a date on appeal Court modified judgment to include agreed commencement date of April 1, 2020

Key Cases Cited

  • Schrodt v. Schrodt, 971 N.W.2d 861 (N.D. 2022) (mixed standard of review for child support and guidance on imputing income)
  • McClure v. McClure, 667 N.W.2d 575 (N.D. 2003) (requirement to use subdivision that results in greatest imputed income)
  • Verhey v. McKenzie, 763 N.W.2d 113 (N.D. 2009) (burden on obligor to prove exception to imputation based on local job unavailability)
  • Rathbun v. Rathbun, 889 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 2017) (application of unavailability exception where extensive unsuccessful job applications were shown)
  • Iakel-Garcia v. Anderson, 966 N.W.2d 892 (N.D. 2021) (use of Ruff-Fischer factors and clearly erroneous standard for property division)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Updike v. Updike
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: May 12, 2022
Citations: 974 N.W.2d 360; 2022 ND 99; 20210265
Docket Number: 20210265
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In