History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
KP-0171
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • The City of Ovilla (a Type A general-law municipality) included HOA dues on monthly water bills for members of two homeowners associations (HOAs) and remitted those dues to the HOAs.
  • The HOAs reimbursed the City for a portion of the City’s accounting software maintenance and service costs; the software was purchased to account for HOA dues collection rather than for utility billing.
  • HOA dues arise from restrictive covenants and dedicatory instruments governing residential subdivisions; dues are contractual obligations used for the private benefit of subdivision owners.
  • Type A general-law municipalities have only statutory powers expressly granted or necessarily implied to effect those powers; courts construe such powers narrowly.
  • No statute expressly authorizes a Type A general-law municipality to collect funds on behalf of a private entity such as an HOA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a Type A general-law municipality may lawfully collect HOA dues on behalf of HOAs Collecting dues promotes municipal welfare by maintaining property and property values The practice is authorized as an ordinance necessary for the municipality’s government, welfare, or good order Held: No — Type A general-law municipality lacks express or implied authority to collect HOA dues

Key Cases Cited

  • Tex. Dep't of Transp. v. City of Sunset Valley, 146 S.W.3d 637 (Tex. 2004) (general-law municipalities have only state-conferred powers)
  • Town of Lakewood Vill. v. Bizios, 493 S.W.3d 527 (Tex. 2016) (powers of general-law municipalities are strictly construed; implied powers limited to those indispensable to express powers)
  • Baywood Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Caolo, 392 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. App.-Tyler 2012) (HOA assessments enforced via restrictive covenants)
  • Harris Cty. Flood Control Dist. v. Glenbrook Patiohome Owners Ass'n, 933 S.W.2d 570 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1996) (HOA covenants construed like contracts)
  • Boudreaux Civic Ass'n v. Cox, 882 S.W.2d 543 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1994) (restrictive covenants treated as contracts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 2017
Docket Number: KP-0171
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.