History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
GA-0860
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • TYC must provide information to a public school district under article 15.27(b) when a parolee enrolled in a new district and is convicted or adjudicated; subsection (c) requires notice within 24 hours of transfer for conviction/adjudication, incorporating subsection (a) or (e)(2) for private schools as applicable; subsection (a) involves oral notice within 24 hours and a written notice within seven days detailing the offense and related information; the question is what constitutes a valid
  • TYC interpretation addresses what constitutes a
  • this Office previously held in DM-294 that arrest information is covered but not the conviction/adjudication notice; the opinion analyzes whether a concise
  • the opinion also considers whether the request for additional information beyond the statutorily described
  • the opinion clarifies that a
  • the opinion applies only to conviction/adjudication notices under 15.27(b).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
What is a valid 'statement of the offense' under 15.27(b)? Townsend seeks broader information beyond the offense statement. TYC's duty is limited to the 'statement of the offense' as construed. A statement of the offense must describe the offense in a discernible manner.
Can districts demand information beyond the 'statement of offense' under 15.27(b)? Requests for additional information are beyond 15.27(b). Only the offense statement and sex-offender flag are required. No; 15.27(b) does not require extra information.
Is Attorney General DM-294 applicable to conviction notices under 15.27(b)? DM-294 governs arrest information. DM-294 does not apply to conviction/adjudication notices. DM-294 applies to arrest information, not conviction/adjudication notices.

Key Cases Cited

  • Garcia v. State, 228 S.W.3d 703 (Tex. App.—Hou. [14th Dist.] 2005) (definition of 'statement about the offense' must describe the offense discernibly)
  • Garcia v. State, 792 S.W.2d 88 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (earlier articulation of 'statement about the offense' concept)
  • Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (U.S. 2001) (offense definition may include relevant conduct beyond indictment)
  • United States v. Moore, 997 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1993) (definition of 'offense' includes relevant conduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 2011
Docket Number: GA-0860
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.