Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
GA-0909
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 2012Background
- Detention under section 573.021 involves a preliminary examination by a mental health facility with no court involvement initially.
- Question concerns transportation of a mentally ill person to ASH or similar facility after a preliminary examination.
- 574.045 governs transportation for committed patients or those detained under 573.022 or 574.023, not for 573.021.
- Sections 573.022 and 574.023 authorize transportation under specified conditions with court involvement.
- Purpose of the Code balances detention, humane treatment, and due process rights in transportation decisions.
- The question arises whether a mental health facility may arrange private transport under 573.021 without court order.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether 574.045 authorizes transport of a 573.021 detainee | Miller questions private conveyance by initial facility | 574.045 applies only to 573.022/574.023, not 573.021 | Not authorized under 574.045 for 573.021 detainee |
| Scope of transportation provisions for detained patients | Facility should transport to ASH without court involvement | Legislation targets 573.022/574.023 with court process | Transportation to ASH limited to 573.022/574.023 framework |
| Effect of a physician's 573.022 written findings on transport authority | Post-examination transport should be permissible | Transport requires 573.022 and 574.045 framework | Once 573.022 findings exist, transport under 573.022 and 574.045 is authorized |
Key Cases Cited
- TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co. v. Combs, 340 S.W.3d 432 (Tex. 2011) (statutory text should reflect legislative intent; omit words not chosen)
- FM Props. Operating Co. v. City of Austin, 22 S.W.3d 868 (Tex. 2000) (legislature's knowledge of how to enact law supports interpreting text to effect intent)
- O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1975) (involuntary commitment implicates due process protections)
- Nootsie, Ltd. v. Williamson Cnty. Appraisal Dist., 925 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. 1996) (avoid interpretations defeating the purpose of legislation)
