History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
GA-0909
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Detention under section 573.021 involves a preliminary examination by a mental health facility with no court involvement initially.
  • Question concerns transportation of a mentally ill person to ASH or similar facility after a preliminary examination.
  • 574.045 governs transportation for committed patients or those detained under 573.022 or 574.023, not for 573.021.
  • Sections 573.022 and 574.023 authorize transportation under specified conditions with court involvement.
  • Purpose of the Code balances detention, humane treatment, and due process rights in transportation decisions.
  • The question arises whether a mental health facility may arrange private transport under 573.021 without court order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 574.045 authorizes transport of a 573.021 detainee Miller questions private conveyance by initial facility 574.045 applies only to 573.022/574.023, not 573.021 Not authorized under 574.045 for 573.021 detainee
Scope of transportation provisions for detained patients Facility should transport to ASH without court involvement Legislation targets 573.022/574.023 with court process Transportation to ASH limited to 573.022/574.023 framework
Effect of a physician's 573.022 written findings on transport authority Post-examination transport should be permissible Transport requires 573.022 and 574.045 framework Once 573.022 findings exist, transport under 573.022 and 574.045 is authorized

Key Cases Cited

  • TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co. v. Combs, 340 S.W.3d 432 (Tex. 2011) (statutory text should reflect legislative intent; omit words not chosen)
  • FM Props. Operating Co. v. City of Austin, 22 S.W.3d 868 (Tex. 2000) (legislature's knowledge of how to enact law supports interpreting text to effect intent)
  • O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1975) (involuntary commitment implicates due process protections)
  • Nootsie, Ltd. v. Williamson Cnty. Appraisal Dist., 925 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. 1996) (avoid interpretations defeating the purpose of legislation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 2012
Docket Number: GA-0909
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.