midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
915 F.3d 431
7th Cir.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Vaccaro was stopped for running a red light; officers observed short, furtive/aggressive movements (bending at the waist, reaching toward passenger/rear seats) and he later admitted removing his coat.
  • Officers ordered him out, handcuffed him in a squad car, and conducted a pat-down; no weapon was found on his person but a GPS monitor, probation status, and nervous/drug-influence indicators were noted.
  • Officers returned to Vaccaro’s vehicle, saw (and later uncovered) a rifle case in the backseat and recovered a rifle from inside.
  • Magistrate judge credited Vaccaro’s movements but discredited officers’ claim they saw the rifle case before placing him in the squad car; recommended denying suppression.
  • District court accepted those factual findings, held the pat-down lawful under Terry, and upheld the vehicle sweep under Michigan v. Long (treating the encounter as a Terry stop, not an arrest).
  • Vaccaro pleaded guilty conditionally to being a felon in possession (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)) and appealed the denial of the suppression motion; Seventh Circuit affirmed.

Issues

Issue Vaccaro's Argument Government's Argument Held
Lawfulness of the pat-down (Terry) Movements did not justify frisk; officers’ testimony unreliable Furtive, aggressive movements reasonably suggested weapon risk Pat-down lawful: reasonable suspicion supported frisk
Handcuffing during Terry stop Handcuffing made frisk unreasonable / converted stop to arrest Handcuffs were reasonable for officer safety given movements Handcuffing permissible given officer-safety concerns; did not convert to arrest
Lawfulness of vehicle sweep (Long) Search invalid because Vaccaro was handcuffed/locked in squad car (Gant) Long/Arnold permit passenger-compartment sweep during Terry stop for officer safety Sweep lawful: Long applies to Terry stops; Vaccaro conceded he was not arrested and could have returned to car
Applicability of Gant v. Arizona Gant controls and forbids search where detainee is secured in squad car Gant applies to custodial arrests; Arnold controls Terry stops where return to car possible Gant inapplicable; Arnold/Long govern; search reasonable

Key Cases Cited

  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (officer may conduct limited pat-down for weapons upon reasonable suspicion)
  • Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (vehicle passenger-compartment sweep permissible when officer reasonably believes suspect dangerous and may access weapons)
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) (limits searches incident to arrest where arrestee cannot access vehicle)
  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) (reasonable-suspicion and probable-cause legal conclusions reviewed de novo)
  • United States v. Arnold, 388 F.3d 237 (7th Cir. 2004) (Terry-stop vehicle search permissible where suspect detained but not arrested and could regain access to vehicle)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Vaccaro
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Feb 7, 2019
Citations: 915 F.3d 431; No. 18-1753
Docket Number: No. 18-1753
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Vaccaro, 915 F.3d 431