History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.
2011 WL 2421225
Ct. Intl. Trade
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Trek Leather, Inc. was importer of record for 72 entries of men's suits (Feb 2–Oct 8, 2004).
  • Harish Shadadpuri was Trek's president and 40% owner; he also owned Mercantile Electronics, LLC, consignee for the goods.
  • Fabric assists were provided by Shadadpuri via corporate entities and incorporated into the suits by manufacturers.
  • CBP investigated in 2004 and found entry declarations consistently failed to reflect the cost of fabric assists, underreporting duties.
  • A prior 2002 investigation of Mercantile Wholesale, Inc. (another Shadadpuri entity) showed similar omissions; $46,156.89 in unpaid duties followed, but no action was filed.
  • In this action, Government seeks: (i) damages for fraud or gross negligence; (ii) civil penalties; and (iii) unpaid duties; Trek admits gross negligence but denies fraud.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Fraud liability under 1592(a) Government contends intentional fraud can be implied. Shadadpuri argues no intent to defraud. Fraud issue cannot be decided on summary judgment.
Gross negligence under 1592(a) Defendants' omissions were material and done with knowledge or reckless disregard. Defendants dispute personal liability and mens rea. Grant summary judgment for Government on Count II; gross negligence established.
Personal liability of Shadadpuri under 1592(a) Shadadpuri as a person is liable for gross negligence. Personal liability contested. Shadadpuri personally liable under §1592(a).
Damages and penalties Defendants liable for unpaid duties and civil penalties. Arguments on amount and apportionment not favorable. Unpaid duties: $45,245.39; Penalties: $534,420.32; joint and several.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Inn Foods, Inc., 560 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (statutory recovery in §1592(d) not limited to importers and sureties)
  • United States v. Matthews, 533 F.Supp.2d 1307 (2007) (plain language of §1592 broad liability for persons)
  • United States v. Complex Mach. Works Co., 83 F.Supp.2d 1307 (1999) (court's within-statutory discretion for penalties under §1592(c)(2))
  • United States v. Thorson Chem. Corp., 795 F.Supp.1190 (1992) (consideration of aggravating/mitigating factors in penalties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.
Court Name: United States Court of International Trade
Date Published: Jun 15, 2011
Citation: 2011 WL 2421225
Docket Number: Slip Op. 11-68; Court 09-00041
Court Abbreviation: Ct. Intl. Trade