558 F. App'x 386
5th Cir.2014Background
- Officers responded to a report that Kasi Guyton received a counterfeit $100 bill at a yard sale and that the payer was a black male accompanied by a white male in a silver Toyota pickup with Florida plates.
- Officer Benjamin saw a truck matching the description, followed it to a gas station, activated his lights, and encountered Anthony Jones (driver) and Terry Brown (passenger/outside passenger door).
- Brown attempted to walk into the convenience store despite repeated orders to return; Benjamin drew his weapon after Brown failed to comply; Jones was searched and a counterfeit $100 was found; additional counterfeit bills and yard-sale items were located in the truck.
- Brown was detained and later charged with aiding and abetting passing counterfeit bills; he moved to suppress statements made while detained, arguing his arrest/detention lacked probable cause.
- The district court denied suppression after a hearing; Brown pleaded guilty conditionally and appealed the denial. The Fifth Circuit reviews factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officer had reasonable suspicion to stop/detain Brown (Terry) | Brown: no individualized suspicion; he was not operating the truck and was merely present | Govt: caller identified two men and a vehicle; Brown matched presence/description and acted evasively | Court: Stop justified; reasonable suspicion existed to include Brown |
| Whether officer’s use of force (drawing weapon, ordering compliance) exceeded Terry scope | Brown: show of force converted detention into de facto arrest without probable cause | Govt: force was proportionate to dispel danger and enforce orders during investigative detention | Court: Drawing weapon and orders did not exceed Terry scope given disobedience and suspicion |
| Whether reasonable suspicion ripened into probable cause to arrest Brown | Brown: presence and association alone insufficient; no counterfeit found on him | Govt: combined factors (matching vehicle, eyewitness ID, Brown’s evasive conduct, open containers) created probable cause | Court: Laminated total established probable cause during stop; arrest valid |
| Whether district court committed reversible factual errors | Brown: court misfound counterfeit found on his person and overstated identifications | Govt: most findings supported; any error harmless | Court: One finding (counterfeit on Brown) was clear error but harmless; other findings supported and do not alter result |
Key Cases Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (brief investigatory stops permitted on reasonable suspicion)
- United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500 (5th Cir. 2004) (two-step Terry analysis; review standards)
- United States v. Vickers, 540 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 2008) (reasonable suspicion requires less than probable cause; evaluated from officer's viewpoint)
- United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (totality-of-circumstances reasonable-suspicion analysis)
- United States v. Olivares-Pacheco, 633 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2011) (laminated total approach)
- United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2010) (reasonable suspicion can ripen into probable cause during stop)
- United States v. Rice, 652 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1981) (bystander’s independent evasive conduct can support probable cause)
- United States v. Hernandez, 825 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1987) (eyewitness identification of a perpetrator supports probable cause)
- United States v. Abdo, 733 F.3d 562 (5th Cir. 2013) (drawing a weapon during a Terry stop does not automatically convert it to an arrest)
