United States v. Tauya Muteke
17-10453
| 11th Cir. | Dec 12, 2017Background
- 2009 nine-count indictment charged 2006 conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 7206(2); Counts 1 and 5 alleged false filings; trial set for March 8, 2010; defendant failed to appear.
- 2015 arrest in Atlanta; new trial date set for December 7, 2015.
- 2015-11-09 defendant moved to dismiss under Speedy Trial Act; district court dismissed indictment without prejudice on 2015-12-02.
- 2015-11-17 separate indictment for failure to appear; 2016-01-19 superseding indictment charged Counts 2 and 3 for 2006 conduct; alleged false items in K.C. and E.T. returns.
- Defendant moved to dismiss Counts 2 and 3 as barred by statute of limitations; magistrate recommended denial; district court adopted; defendant convicted on Counts 1–3.
- On appeal, the district court’s denial of the motion to dismiss Counts 2 and 3 was reviewed and upheld.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| tolling under §3288 saves superseding indictment | Government: charges substantially same; tolling valid | Muteke: charges broadened beyond original | §3288 saved; no dismissal; charges substantially same |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Italiano, 894 F.2d 1280 (11th Cir. 1990) (tolling if new indictment does not broaden original charges)
- United States v. Farias, 836 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2016) (timely indictment tolls for superseding indictment when not broadening charges)
