History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 United States Currency
858 F. Supp. 2d 246
W.D.N.Y.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • The Government filed an in rem forfeiture action seeking $185,336.07 in U.S. currency under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
  • The currency was seized from Dominic Pellegrino on June 20, 2007 for alleged involvement in illegal drug transactions.
  • Claimant filed a verifyed claim on October 23, 2009 requesting return of the funds as proceeds of lawful activity.
  • The Government moved for summary judgment after discovery, contending the funds are forfeitable by a preponderance of the evidence.
  • The Government presented evidence of drug trafficking activity, a May 3, 2007 search, and substantial unexplained deposits totaling $169,000 over three years.
  • Claimant argued the funds derive from legitimate sources (personal injury settlement, insurance, retirement) but failed to provide admissible, timely corroborated evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Government proved probable cause for forfeiture. Pellegrino United States Yes; Government showed nexus via drug trafficking activity and unexplained wealth
Whether claimant established legitimate sources for the funds to defeat forfeiture. Pellegrino United States No; lack of credible, timely evidence and failure to disclose undermined legitimacy assertion
Whether claimant’s Fifth Amendment silence during discovery precluded consideration of evidence. Pellegrino United States Yes; negative inference allowed and evidence not timely disclosed could not be considered

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Fischl, 128 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 1997) (burden shifting in forfeiture cases; preponderance standard)
  • United States v. $8,880 in United States Currency, 945 F. Supp. 521 (W.D.N.Y. 1996) (government need not prove transaction-level nexus, only a nexus to drug activity)
  • United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37 (2d Cir. 1993) (circumstantial nexus suffices for forfeiture)
  • United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 15 Black Ledge Drive, 897 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1990) (burden shifts to claimant after probable cause is shown)
  • United States v. Hinton, 543 F.2d 1002 (2d Cir. 1976) (failure to file tax returns can negate legitimate income source)
  • United States v. St. Prix, 672 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1982) (non-filing can affect legitimacy of income source)
  • United States v. 4,003-4005 5th Ave., 55 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 1995) (consideration of tax-related and income-source evidence in forfeiture)
  • Randell v. United States, 64 F.3d 101 (2d Cir. 1995) (evidence in opposition to summary judgment must be admissible and properly disclosed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Sum of $185,336.07 United States Currency
Court Name: District Court, W.D. New York
Date Published: May 2, 2012
Citation: 858 F. Supp. 2d 246
Docket Number: No. 08-CV-6287L
Court Abbreviation: W.D.N.Y.