History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Solis
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5894
| 5th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Solis pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine hydrochloride.
  • Arrest occurred October 22, 2003, when officers found $837,000 in a hidden compartment in a vehicle.
  • Sentencing would normally impose a 10-year statutory mandatory minimum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A).
  • PSR concluded Solis was ineligible for the safety valve due to more than one criminal history point.
  • District court, applying the 2002 Guidelines, did not count two marijuana conviction points and concluded it could sentence Solis under the safety valve within the guidelines.
  • Government appealed the below-minimum sentence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Amendment 651's effect on safety valve. Amendment 651 is clarifying and retroactive for safety valve. Amendment 651 is substantive, not clarifying, and not retroactively applicable. Amendment 651 is not clarifying; not retroactive under § 1B1.11(b)(2).
Whether 2002 guidelines ambiguously permit § 4A1.3 departures when evaluating safety valve eligibility. 2002 § 4A1.3 allows downward departures; could affect safety valve. Downward departures do not change the number of criminal history points; no eligibility. 2002 edition is not ambiguous; departures under § 4A1.3 cannot be used to alter § 5C1.2 eligibility.

Key Cases Cited

  • Valencia-Andrade, 72 F.3d 770 (9th Cir.1995) (downward departures not to be considered for safety valve)
  • Resto, 74 F.3d 22 (2d Cir.1996) (clarifies § 5C1.2 commentary on criminal history points)
  • Orozco, 121 F.3d 628 (11th Cir.1997) (depicts computation of criminal history points)
  • Robinson, 158 F.3d 1291 (D.C.Cir.1998) (guideline interpretation of 4A1.3 and safety valve)
  • Owensby, 188 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir.1999) (4A1.3 departs do not subtract individual points)
  • Webb, 218 F.3d 877 (8th Cir.2000) (4A1.3 departs and safety valve analysis)
  • Penn, 282 F.3d 879 (6th Cir.2002) (precedent on departure limitations and safety valve)
  • Jasso, 634 F.3d 305 (5th Cir.2011) (4A1.3 does not permit reducing individual points)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Solis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 21, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5894
Docket Number: 11-30390
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.