History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Shane Richard Robinson
684 F. App'x 901
| 11th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Shane Richard Robinson pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).
  • The district court imposed a 127-month sentence, below the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range after applying the § 4B1.1 career offender enhancement.
  • Robinson challenged the career-offender enhancement on appeal, arguing his two prior Florida convictions under Fla. Stat. § 893.13 (2008 and 2013 sales of cocaine offenses) lack a mens rea element and thus are not "controlled substance offenses" under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b).
  • Florida law punishes sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a convenience business as a first-degree felony and sale of cocaine generally as a second-degree felony, both carrying sentences exceeding one year.
  • The Eleventh Circuit reviews de novo whether the career-offender enhancement properly applies and recognized that binding precedent has held § 893.13 convictions qualify as controlled substance offenses for § 4B1.2(b).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Robinson's prior Fla. Stat. § 893.13 convictions qualify as "controlled substance offenses" for the career-offender enhancement Robinson: § 893.13 lacks a mens rea requirement, so convictions do not meet § 4B1.2(b) definition Government: § 893.13 convictions are punishable >1 year and prohibit distribution, satisfying § 4B1.2(b) The court affirmed: under binding Eleventh Circuit precedent, § 893.13 convictions qualify and the enhancement was proper

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Whitson, 597 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for career-offender enhancement)
  • United States v. Smith, 775 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2014) (held Fla. Stat. § 893.13 convictions qualify as "controlled substance offenses")
  • United States v. Brown, 342 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2003) (panel bound by prior precedent absent overruling by en banc court or Supreme Court)
  • United States v. Archer, 531 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2008) (Supreme Court decisions must be clearly on point to abrogate panel precedent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Shane Richard Robinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Apr 10, 2017
Citation: 684 F. App'x 901
Docket Number: 16-16176 Non-Argument Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.