History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Roussell
2:22-cr-00001
| E.D. La. | Jun 18, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Rodney Roussell was convicted of bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 for embezzling over $200,000 from his employer, who hired him through a re-entry program for those with criminal records.
  • Roussell pled guilty, was sentenced to 70 months' imprisonment, five years' supervised release, and ordered to pay restitution.
  • Roussell filed a Motion for Compassionate Release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), arguing family caregiving responsibilities, rehabilitation efforts, and favorable sentencing factors.
  • The government opposed, arguing Roussell failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons for release under policy statements and statutory requirements.
  • Roussell also sought appointment of counsel for his motion, claiming complexity and just cause for legal assistance.
  • The court considered his motions after exhaustion of administrative remedies and full briefing by both sides.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Appointment of Counsel for Compassionate Release Motion Roussell is entitled or needs counsel for complex issues No statutory/constitutional right; Roussell's filings are adequate Denied; no statutory right or justice-based need
Compassionate Release—Family Circumstances Only available caregiver for incapacitated parents; meets policy requirement Parents not completely incapacitated; father available; others available Denied; not the only caregiver or extraordinary
Compassionate Release—Other Reasons (Rehabilitation) Rehabilitation and good conduct are extraordinary and compelling Rehabilitation alone not sufficient; must be similar in gravity to enumerated Denied; not extraordinary under policy
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Sentencing Factors and Release Factors favor release given personal circumstances and conduct Offense severity and criminal history oppose early release Denied; § 3553(a) factors weigh against release

Key Cases Cited

  • Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551 (no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings beyond first appeal)
  • Ward v. United States, 11 F.4th 354 (clarifies burden and process for compassionate release motions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Roussell
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Date Published: Jun 18, 2025
Docket Number: 2:22-cr-00001
Court Abbreviation: E.D. La.