History
  • No items yet
midpage
999 F.3d 60
1st Cir.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Police executed a warrant at an apartment; Rivera was found in a bedroom where drugs and a green-and-black .40 Glock (obliterated serial) were found. An officer opened the apartment padlock with a key from Rivera's key chain. Rivera’s phone contained drug photos.
  • Rivera was indicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, crack, and marijuana, and for possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime; jury convicted on all counts.
  • Rivera moved to suppress; the district court denied the motion (not challenged on appeal).
  • At trial the government introduced a redacted Puerto Rico conviction showing Rivera had possessed a similar green-and-black Glock about a month earlier; that Puerto Rico conviction was later vacated after the Supreme Court’s Ramos decision regarding jury unanimity.
  • Rivera appealed, challenging (1) admission of the prior-conviction/other-acts evidence, (2) exclusion of certain impeachment/audio/work-plan evidence, and (3) several jury instructions. The First Circuit affirmed.

Issues

Issue Rivera's Argument Government's Argument Held
Admissibility of vacated Puerto Rico gun conviction under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) The vacated conviction undermines documentary and testimonial value and its admission violated due process Other-acts evidence may be admitted to show knowledge/intent; admission was properly limited and not unfairly prejudicial Admission was proper: the prior act was specially relevant to knowledge/intent for constructive possession; vacatur did not bar admissibility and error (if any) was waived or harmless
Ability to impeach agent with codefendant’s report claim (padlock/key) Defense sought to show another had a key to impeach agent’s testimony that Rivera had the only keys Statement was hearsay and would only show someone else also had a key, not exclusive control Exclusion harmless: joint constructive possession possible, so the impeachment would not have changed outcome
Exclusion of audio of Rivera saying a key was for his car and evidence of police "work plan" The audio and plan would support Rivera’s theory police planted the gun; admissible under excited-utterance or business-record/state-of-mind exceptions Both were hearsay and properly excluded; even if admitted they would not negate that Rivera had a key linking him to the apartment Any error (if error) was harmless because evidence still linked Rivera to the apartment and likely would not have altered verdict
Jury instructions: mental state for gun possession; aiding-and-abetting "advance knowledge"; actual-possession language Claimed erroneous instructions on mens rea and inclusion of actual-possession language where no direct evidence existed Instructions followed controlling First Circuit and Supreme Court precedent ("knowingly", Rosemond standard for advance knowledge) No plain error: instructions conformed to binding law; actual-possession complaint waived for inadequate briefing

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Tanco-Baez, 942 F.3d 7 (1st Cir. 2019) (constructive possession may be inferred from control over area)
  • United States v. Aguilar-Aranceta, 58 F.3d 796 (1st Cir. 1995) (knowledge is required element for possession)
  • United States v. Powell, 50 F.3d 94 (1st Cir. 1995) (prior gun possession may have special relevance to knowledge and intent)
  • United States v. Wyatt, 561 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2009) (other-acts evidence need not be identical but must have sufficient similarity)
  • Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) (other-acts evidence admissible even if defendant was acquitted of that act)
  • Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014) (aider/abettor liability requires knowledge in time to opt to walk away)
  • United States v. McLean, 409 F.3d 492 (1st Cir. 2005) (constructive possession may be inferred from control of area)
  • United States v. Bobadilla-Pagán, 747 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2014) ("knowingly" is the requisite mens rea for firearms possession in furtherance of drug trafficking)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rivera-Galindez
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Jun 2, 2021
Citations: 999 F.3d 60; 18-1648P
Docket Number: 18-1648P
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
Log In