History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Pruitt
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7567
| 11th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Milton Scott Pruitt, a Forsyth County deputy, used his work computer to access child-pornography stored on the county server without a work-related purpose.
  • Images were located in folders tied to the county detective in charge of computer investigations and some were labeled with the county's 'CP' designation for child pornography.
  • County IT traced unusual network activity to Pruitt's account, leading to an interview and his admission of viewing the images out of curiosity and stupidity.
  • Pruitt allowed a home-computer search, revealing about 70 images in cache and over 200 in unallocated space, with his HP Administrator account showing related searches and site visits.
  • A jury convicted Pruitt on two counts of knowingly receiving child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A); a separate possession count was acquitted.
  • The district court sentenced him to 98 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, followed by 10 years of supervised release.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was sufficient evidence of knowing receipt on the work computer Pruitt knowingly received by viewing files on county server. No active saving or control over files; evidence insufficient. Yes; sufficient evidence of knowing receipt
Whether there was sufficient evidence of knowing receipt on the home computer Cache, unallocated space, searches, and website visits show knowledge and receipt. Trojan virus could explain files; not knowingly received. Yes; sufficient evidence supporting Count Two

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Bobb, 577 F.3d 1366 (11th Cir. 2009) (textual interpretation of 'receipt' consistent with single punishment principle)
  • United States v. Silvestri, 409 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 2005) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence; light in favor of government)
  • United States v. Garcia-Bercovich, 582 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2009) (sufficiency review and scienter considerations under § 2252A(a)(2))
  • United States v. Romm, 455 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2006) (receipt can be established by dominion/control over images viewed)
  • United States v. Flyers, 633 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2011) (unallocated space concept and forensic preservation context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Pruitt
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Apr 13, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7567
Docket Number: 10-10829
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.