History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Pipkin (In re Pipkin)
495 B.R. 878
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Pipkin filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy on February 2, 2012.
  • SSA filed a complaint on May 7, 2012 seeking nondischargeability of a $49,517.70 overpayment under § 523(a)(2).
  • Trial occurred December 11, 2012; both sides submitted briefs; issue proceeded as core under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).
  • SSA contends the overpayment resulted from false pretenses/representations by Pipkin; Pipkin did not dispute the amount and admitted knowledge of ineligibility upon employment.
  • SSA denied Pipkin’s waiver request for repayment and Pipkin did not appeal SSA’s overpayment determination; court held the overpayment was intentionally concealed and caused by failure to report earnings.
  • The court held the debt nondischargeable and invited entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 7058.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the overpayment is nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A). Plaintiff asserts Pipkin obtained benefits via false pretenses/representations. Pipkin contends no non-dischargeability defense beyond waiver considerations. Yes; overpayment is nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A).
Whether Pipkin knowingly failed to report earnings, constituting a false representation. Pipkin knowingly failed to report employment earnings to SSA. Pipkin admits some fault and inability to report; argues waiver issues. Yes; failure to report earnings established a representation with knowledge of falsity for purposes of § 523(a)(2)(A).
Whether SSA waiver denial or lack of appeal affects dischargeability. Waiver denial demonstrates fault by Pipkin. SSA waiver denial is not subject to bankruptcy appellate review; court lacks jurisdiction to review SSA waiver decisions. Waiver denial does not excuse nondischargeability; bankruptcy court cannot review SSA waiver determinations.

Key Cases Cited

  • Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 (1991) (establishes burden and elements for § 523(a)(2) nondischargeability)
  • In re Treadwell, 637 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 2011) (elements for nondischargeability under § 523(a)(2))
  • In re Ophaug, 827 F.2d 340 (8th Cir. 1987) (fraud elements under § 523(a)(2))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Pipkin (In re Pipkin)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas
Date Published: May 24, 2013
Citation: 495 B.R. 878
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 4:12-bk-70380M; Adversary No. 4:12-ap-07050
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. W.D. Ark.