History
  • No items yet
midpage
886 F.3d 686
8th Cir.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Phillip Loyd pleaded guilty to sex trafficking of a minor (18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)) and production of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251(a)).
  • 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e) imposes a mandatory minimum 25-year term for § 2251(a) offenders who have a prior conviction listed in that subsection.
  • Loyd had a prior federal conviction under chapter 117 (18 U.S.C. § 2422(a): inducing interstate travel for prostitution), which the district court treated as a qualifying predicate under § 2251(e).
  • The district court raised the advisory Guidelines bottom from 292 to 300 months to account for the statutory minimum (USSG § 5G1.1(c)(2)) and sentenced Loyd to 324 months (within the adjusted range).
  • Loyd appealed, arguing the phrase "relating to" in § 2251(e) limits the listed federal chapters (including chapter 117), so his chapter 117 conviction should not trigger the § 2251(e) mandatory minimum; the Eighth Circuit affirmed.

Issues

Issue Loyd's Argument Government's Argument Held
Whether the qualifying-language "relating to" in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e) limits only state laws or also the enumerated federal chapters and sections "Relating to" modifies all prior listed federal chapters/sections, so Loyd's chapter 117 conviction does not qualify "Relating to" modifies only the immediately preceding phrase "the laws of any State," so the listed federal chapters/sections qualify The phrase modifies only "the laws of any State;" the chapter 117 conviction qualifies and the mandatory minimum applies

Key Cases Cited

  • Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20 (construing the rule of the last antecedent)
  • Lockhart v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 958 (2016) (discussing last-antecedent and series-qualifier canons)
  • United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336 (1971) (series-qualifier canon and construing modifiers in lists)
  • Wong v. Minn. Dep't of Human Servs., 820 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 2016) (applying series-qualifier canon and Bass discussion)
  • United States v. Pritchett, 470 F.2d 455 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (statutory-list parsing and textual-structure analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Phillip Loyd
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 29, 2018
Citations: 886 F.3d 686; 16-4150
Docket Number: 16-4150
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Phillip Loyd, 886 F.3d 686