History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Patten
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25873
| 8th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Patten married H.P. who had a child, T.A., from a prior relation; T.A. reported on July 12, 2010 that Patten sexually abused her and took nude/explicit photos since she was about 12; evidence included a black digital camera and memory disks hidden in the basement; abuse escalated to sexual acts and threats; Oltman obtained a warrant based on TA's statements but did not name TA in the application; officers seized the camera, memory cards, and later forensic items yielding over 3,000 images including more than 1,000 child-pornography files; Patten pleaded guilty to counts including sexual exploitation of a minor and possession of child pornography, reserving appeal of suppression denial; sentencing followed with 480 months total after upward departures/variance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the suppression denial was correct. Patten argues warrant lacks probable cause due to unreliable/uncorroborated source. State argues good-faith reliance on warrant was reasonable given credibility checks. Affirmed: good-faith exception applied; suppression denied.
Whether the 480-month sentence is valid after the plea and appeal waiver. Patten invokes Eighth Amendment disproportionality and argues illegal sentence but waived appeal. Waiver covers reasonableness challenge, but Eighth Amendment review still possible. Affirmed: sentence within statutory range; appeal waiver enforced; no disproportionality.

Key Cases Cited

  • U.S. v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 598 F.3d 997 (8th Cir.2010) (review of suppression facts and Leon good-faith exception)
  • U.S. v. Clay, 646 F.3d 1124 (8th Cir.2011) (good-faith exception factors; consult with attorney; credibility of CI; reliability of information)
  • U.S. v. Warford, 439 F.3d 836 (8th Cir.2006) (probable cause analysis for warrant validity)
  • U.S. v. Perry, 531 F.3d 662 (8th Cir.2008) (prosecutor’s determination supports probable cause)
  • U.S. v. El-Alamin, 574 F.3d 915 (8th Cir.2009) (Leon good-faith standard applied)
  • U.S. v. Fiorito, 640 F.3d 338 (8th Cir.2011) (limitations on good-faith exception when lacking probable cause)
  • U.S. v. Neadeau, 639 F.3d 453 (8th Cir.2011) (Eighth Amendment review of sentence within statutory range)
  • U.S. v. Collins, 340 F.3d 672 (8th Cir.2003) (threshold disproportionality inquiry under Eighth Amendment)
  • U.S. v. Kattaria, 553 F.3d 1171 (8th Cir.2009) (reliability of firsthand observation supporting credibility)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Patten
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 28, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25873
Docket Number: 11-2268
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.