United States v. Ottriez Sands
815 F.3d 1057
| 7th Cir. | 2015Background
- Police received reliable information from a long-registered confidential informant that a suspect was selling narcotics from a gold Toyota Camry; informant provided plate and suspect description.
- Officer Williams corroborated the informant’s tip by locating the gold Camry at 71st and Paxton and observing a hand-to-hand transaction through the driver’s window that he believed was a narcotics sale.
- Williams radioed an enforcement team; Officer Kilroy drove an enforcement vehicle to the Camry, parked nearby, and approached the car.
- Kilroy observed Sands holding a firearm and moving it into the Camry’s center console; officers removed and detained Sands; Kilroy later found the gun and bags of marijuana under a false console floor.
- Sands was indicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (felon in possession). He moved to quash the arrest and suppress evidence (Fourth Amendment) and was precluded from arguing at closing that a third party placed the gun in the console; the district court denied suppression and granted the in limine motion. Jury convicted Sands.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether arrest/search violated Fourth Amendment (probable cause) | Williams and Kilroy had probable cause to arrest/search because Williams corroborated informant and observed a drug sale | Sands: parking of enforcement vehicle constituted an arrest before Kilroy saw the gun; subsequent observations and search therefore tainted and must be suppressed | Court: Officers had probable cause; collective-knowledge doctrine imputes Williams’s knowledge to Kilroy; vehicle exception justified warrantless search; denial of suppression affirmed |
| Whether district court erred by precluding argument that third party (Hunter) placed the gun in console | Sands: should be allowed to argue Hunter put the gun in console as an alternative theory | Government: no evidence supported claim that Hunter placed the firearm in console; argument would introduce facts not in evidence | Court: District court did not abuse discretion; defense may argue gun belonged to Hunter but may not assert unsupported fact that Hunter placed it in console |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Freeman, 691 F.3d 893 (7th Cir. 2012) (standard of review for suppression rulings: facts for clear error, law de novo)
- United States v. Williams, 627 F.3d 247 (7th Cir. 2010) (collective-knowledge doctrine elements)
- Abbot v. Sangamon Cnty., Ill., 705 F.3d 706 (7th Cir. 2013) (probable cause definition for arrests)
- California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991) (seizure occurs upon submission to authority)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances standard for probable cause)
- United States v. Lechuga, 925 F.2d 1035 (7th Cir. 1991) (blocking vehicles alone does not necessarily constitute an arrest)
- United States v. White, 443 F.3d 582 (7th Cir. 2006) (closing argument theory must have foundation in the evidence)
