United States v. Nathan Mattocks
23-4271
4th Cir.Jun 10, 2025Background
- Nathan Mattocks was initially arrested in August 2020 by the Commonwealth of Virginia on state charges.
- On January 28, 2021, the U.S. government filed a federal criminal complaint, issued a federal arrest warrant, and sent a federal detainer to Virginia authorities.
- Virginia resolved its charges against Mattocks on February 1, 2021, but Mattocks remained in custody based on the federal detainer.
- U.S. Marshals arrested Mattocks on February 3, and he was ordered detained after a federal hearing on February 10.
- Mattocks was indicted federally on March 5, 2021, on drug and firearm charges.
- Mattocks moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing the federal indictment was untimely under the Speedy Trial Act; the district court denied his motion.
Issues
| Issue | Mattocks's Argument | Government's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| When did the federal speedy trial clock start? | Federal restraint began with detainer/state custody end | Detainer alone doesn't trigger, only upon federal arrest | Clock starts at earliest February 1, more likely February 3 |
| Was the indictment filed within 30 days? | Indictment was untimely under the Speedy Trial Act | Excluded days for pretrial motions made indictment timely | Indictment was timely; excluded days make 30 days max |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Woolfolk, 399 F.3d 590 (4th Cir. 2005) (defines when federal speedy trial clock starts for federal restraint)
- United States v. Thomas, 55 F.3d 144 (4th Cir. 1995) (clarifies federal restraint may precede formal federal arrest)
- United States v. Lee, 818 F.2d 302 (4th Cir. 1987) (federal detainer alone is not an arrest to trigger Speedy Trial clock)
- United States v. Wright, 990 F.2d 147 (4th Cir. 1993) (excludes certain days for pretrial motions from speedy trial calculation)
