History
  • No items yet
midpage
528 F. App'x 323
4th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Detectives surveilled Richard as a suspected drug trafficker in North Charleston, SC.
  • A GPS tracker was placed on Richard’s car on May 6, 2009, enabling location monitoring.
  • The car traveled to Newark, NJ, then returned to SC, leading to a traffic stop for a lane-change violation.
  • During the stop, a perimeter canine sniff alerted to the car; drugs were found in the vehicle.
  • A hidden compartment under the center console yielded 36.2 grams of heroin; a search warrant uncovered more heroin, bags, and related items.
  • Richard was indicted for possession with intent to distribute heroin; suppression motions were litigated, and retrials followed a Jones-based remand.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
TaIlnt purge after illegal GPS search Taint remained because stop depended on GPS evidence. Intervening traffic violation purges taint per Sprinkle. Taint purged; traffic violation provided independent basis for stop and search.
Career offender designation validity Prior convictions improperly counted for career-offender status. Multiple prior felonies properly counted under USSG 4A1.2 and 4B1.1. Designations valid; convictions properly counted to sustain career-offender status.
Reasonableness of within-Guidelines sentence Sentence overstated given actual criminal history. District court properly applied guidelines with individualized reasoning. Sentence deemed reasonable; presumption of reasonableness preserved.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Sprinkle, 106 F.3d 613 (4th Cir. 1997) (new, distinct crime may purge taint from an illegal stop)
  • United States v. Gaines, 668 F.3d 170 (4th Cir. 2012) (distinguishes Sprinkle when taint is not purged by later conduct)
  • Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court 1975) (attenuation factors for purging taint from unconstitutional police conduct)
  • United States v. Branch, 537 F.3d 328 (4th Cir. 2008) (probable cause and limits of stop and subsequent actions)
  • United States v. Digiovanni, 650 F.3d 498 (4th Cir. 2011) (reasonable limitations on extending a traffic stop without justification)
  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (Supreme Court 2005) (canine sniff legality during lawful traffic stop)
  • Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court 2009) (limits on extending stop during canine/safety procedures)
  • United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012) (GPS tracking without a valid warrant constitutes a unreasonable search)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Naarl Richard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 13, 2013
Citations: 528 F. App'x 323; 12-4627
Docket Number: 12-4627
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In