History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. McNeil
0:17-cr-00765
| D.S.C. | Jun 30, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Zadgery Collins McNeil pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to distribute marijuana.
  • He was sentenced to 150 months of imprisonment, with a projected release date of February 27, 2028.
  • McNeil previously sought compassionate release, which was denied, and has now filed a renewed motion citing changes in law, family circumstances, and rehabilitation.
  • The government concedes McNeil exhausted administrative remedies, allowing the motion to proceed on its merits.
  • The Court reviewed several grounds asserted by McNeil for a sentence reduction, including Amendment 829 to the Sentencing Guidelines (not yet retroactive), family needs, and completion of rehabilitation programs in prison.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Amendment 829 to U.S.S.G. is extraordinary reason Law change justifies release Amendment 829 not applicable/retroactive Not extraordinary or compelling reason
Family circumstances justify release Must care for minor son; parents unable No proof others can't care; parents not incapacitated Not extraordinary or compelling reason
Rehabilitation merits compassionate release Completed many programs Rehabilitation alone not enough; disciplinary history Not extraordinary or compelling reason
Section 3553(a) factors support reduction Mitigating conduct/support for reduction Serious criminal conduct & history, public protection Do not support sentence reduction

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Woody, 115 F.4th 304 (4th Cir. 2024) (two-step analysis for compassionate release: extraordinary/compelling reason, then Section 3553(a) factors)
  • United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274 (4th Cir. 2024) (first step: extraordinary and compelling reasons for release)
  • United States v. Hargrove, 30 F.4th 189 (4th Cir. 2022) (extraordinary and compelling reasons must be consistent with Sentencing Commission policy)
  • United States v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826 (4th Cir. 2022) (broad discretion in evaluating Section 3553(a) factors)
  • United States v. Bond, 56 F.4th 381 (4th Cir. 2023) (Section 3553(a) review is required following extraordinary reason finding)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. McNeil
Court Name: District Court, D. South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 30, 2025
Docket Number: 0:17-cr-00765
Court Abbreviation: D.S.C.