History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. McClain
2012 CAAF LEXIS 392
C.A.A.F.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • McClain was convicted at a general court-martial of possessing and distributing child pornography under Article 134, UCMJ; the convening authority approved most of the sentence but modified confinement; the Army Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) affirmed possession and sentence while dismissing the distribution specification.
  • NCIS identified an IP address in Hawaii associated with McClain that allegedly contained child-pornography video files in a Limewire share folder; McClain's computer did not contain the four charged videos, but a search showed similar files in a shared folder on his machine.
  • McClain admitted in a pretrial statement to knowingly downloading child pornography while stationed in Hawaii and later stated he could not recall the exact file names but had downloaded those videos.
  • McClain claimed there was no proof the downloaded videos were the four charged files and argued he did not have dominion or control over the files; the government offered corroboration tying the shared-folder files to the charged videos.
  • The military judge admitted the pretrial statement and relied on corroborating evidence (including SH A1 values and file characteristics) to support the possession conviction, and this Court reviews legal-sufficiency de novo.
  • The Court holds the evidence is legally sufficient to convict of possession of child pornography beyond a reasonable doubt.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the possession verdict legally sufficient? McClain argues no direct link or dominion over the four charged videos. McClain contends lack of proof the on-device videos were the charged ones and no exclusive control. Yes; evidence, including corroborated statements and shared-file characteristics, supports possession.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Winckelmann, 70 M.J. 403 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (legal-sufficiency review standard; rational-trier-of-fact formulation)
  • United States v. Bright, 66 M.J. 359 (C.A.A.F. 2008) (draw every reasonable inference in favor of the prosecution)
  • Harcrow v. United States, 66 M.J. 154 (C.A.A.F. 2008) (low threshold for corroboration of accomplice or self-serving statements)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for legally sufficient evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. McClain
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date Published: Apr 10, 2012
Citation: 2012 CAAF LEXIS 392
Docket Number: 12-0099/AR
Court Abbreviation: C.A.A.F.