United States v. Marvin Cates
950 F.3d 453
| 7th Cir. | 2020Background
- Cates was stopped for a vehicle equipment violation; deputy saw a revolver; cocaine and heroin later found; charged under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
- Motion to suppress the seized items was denied; parties submitted a plea agreement on September 12, 2018; Cates waived all appeals except ineffective-assistance claims.
- A magistrate judge conducted a Rule 11 hearing, found the plea knowing and voluntary, and the district court accepted the plea on October 3, 2018.
- Cates’s original counsel withdrew; new counsel filed to withdraw the plea alleging duress and also asserting Cates had told counsel before acceptance that he wanted to withdraw but was told it was too late.
- District court held a hearing on December 13, denied the motion to withdraw, found no duress, and sentenced Cates to 262 months under the ACCA.
- On appeal Cates argued his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to withdraw the plea when asked; the Seventh Circuit reviewed for plain error and affirmed, holding the record insufficient to resolve the Strickland claim and advising a § 2255 collateral attack instead.
Issues
| Issue | Cates's Argument | Government/District Court Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was constitutionally ineffective for not moving to withdraw Cates’s guilty plea when Cates allegedly asked before the plea was accepted | Counsel failed to move to withdraw the plea when Cates timely asked; that failure was deficient and prejudiced Cates because he lost the chance to go to trial | The record does not establish the alleged timely request; the claim was not adequately raised below, and the record is inadequate to resolve credibility or prejudice | Affirmed: record insufficient under Strickland and Massaro; claim better developed in a § 2255 collateral proceeding |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes two-prong ineffective-assistance test: deficient performance and prejudice)
- Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 (2003) (ineffective-assistance claims are generally resolved in collateral § 2255 proceedings to develop a full record)
- United States v. Shaker, 279 F.3d 494 (7th Cir. 2002) (defendant may withdraw guilty plea before the court accepts it)
- United States v. Flores, 739 F.3d 337 (7th Cir. 2014) (warns against raising ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal and endorses collateral attack route)
- United States v. Arami, 536 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2008) (applied plain-error review and reversed where timely withdrawal before acceptance was improperly denied)
- United States v. Banks, 405 F.3d 559 (7th Cir. 2005) (discusses Strickland presumption that counsel’s choices are reasonable)
