History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Lucero
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7516
| 10th Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Lucero pled guilty in 2003 to possession of over 50 grams cocaine base with intent to distribute (Count 1) and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime (Count 2).
  • At sentencing, 126.3 grams of cocaine base yielded a base level 32; with acceptance of responsibility, Count 1 range was 121–151 months; 10-year mandatory minimum applied under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A).
  • Lucero was sentenced on Count 1 to 121 months and Count 2 to 60 months, consecutive, for a total of 181 months.
  • In 2007 and 2010 amendments reduced the cocaine base offense level and directed retroactive application; FSA increased the trigger threshold for the ten-year minimum from 50 to 280 grams.
  • Lucero filed a second § 3582(c)(2) motion in 2012 arguing FSA and subsequent amendments (and Dorsey) require applying the new mandatory minimums; the district court denied, but sua sponte reduced Count 1 to 120 months; appeal followed to challenge retroactivity and authority to reduce pre-FSA sentences.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether FSA reductions apply retroactively to pre-FSA sentences in §3582(c)(2) motions. Lucero argues Dorsey extends retroactivity to post-FSA relief. Lucero contends FSA is not retroactive for pre-FSA sentences. No retroactive application; FSA does not apply to pre-FSA sentences in §3582(c)(2) motions.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Foster, 706 F.3d 887 (7th Cir. 2013) (affirming denial of § 3582(c)(2) reduction for pre-FSA sentencing under FSA)
  • United States v. Lewis, 625 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2010) (FSA not retroactive (overruled in part by Dorsey))
  • United States v. Osborn, 679 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2012) (applies pre-FSA minimum when §3582(c)(2) reduction would not lower guideline range)
  • United States v. Cornelius, 696 F.3d 1307 (10th Cir. 2012) (FSA does not retroactively extinguish pre-FSA mandatory minimums)
  • United States v. Berry, 701 F.3d 374 (11th Cir. 2012) (denial of §3582(c)(2) reduction where FSA minimums applied)
  • Dorsey v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012) (limited retroactivity to post-FSA sentencing for post-FSA conduct)
  • United States v. Battle, 706 F.3d 1313 (10th Cir. 2013) (narrow authority to modify sentence under §3582(c)(2) per 1B1.10)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Lucero
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 15, 2013
Citation: 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7516
Docket Number: 12-2132
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.