66 F.4th 1284
11th Cir.2023Background
- Gruezo was indicted for (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute ≥5 kg of cocaine on a vessel subject to U.S. jurisdiction and (2) possession with intent to distribute ≥5 kg of cocaine on such a vessel; offense occurred May 5, 2021 in international waters near Darwin Island, Ecuador.
- Coast Guard boarded a low-profile vessel that had no visible name, registration, flag, or other indicia of nationality; the master (Estupinan) did not claim a nationality when asked.
- Government reports included a Victor Report (stating no registry) and an Alpha Report (erroneously listing Colombian nationality); Coast Guard Petty Officer Rivera testified the Alpha Report contained a transcription error.
- Gruezo pled guilty without a written plea agreement and stipulated facts about the vessel’s lack of indicia of nationality and the discovery of ≈1,390 kg of cocaine.
- At sentencing the PSR yielded an adjusted offense level of 33 (guideline range 135–168 months); Gruezo sought a two-level minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. §3B1.2.
- District court denied the motion to dismiss (MDLEA jurisdiction), accepted the guilty plea, denied the minor-role reduction, and sentenced Gruezo to 135 months; Eleventh Circuit affirmed on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Gov't) | Defendant's Argument (Gruezo) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDLEA jurisdiction — was the vessel "without nationality" under 46 U.S.C. §70502(d)(1)(B)? | Master failed to claim nationality or registry; defendant stipulated to lack of indicia; Victor Report and testimony support stateless finding. | Coast Guard failed to make required inquiries; conflicting Alpha Report and Victor Report create jurisdictional doubt. | Affirmed — stipulation and master’s failure to claim nationality suffice; district court credibility findings reasonable. |
| Vagueness — is §70502(d)(1)(B) unconstitutionally vague? | Statute gives adequate notice; prior precedent rejects vagueness challenges to MDLEA jurisdictional provisions. | Statute fails to define what constitutes a "claim of nationality or registry." | Rejected — statute sufficiently clear; precedent forecloses vagueness challenge. |
| Miranda — must Coast Guard advise master of consequences of failing to claim nationality? | Routine boarding is non-custodial; Miranda warnings not required; any as-applied challenge waived by guilty plea. | Failure to warn of legal consequence (treatment as stateless) violated Miranda/due process. | Rejected — as-applied claim waived by plea; facial Miranda challenge foreclosed by precedent that routine boardings are non-custodial. |
| Sentencing — entitlement to two-level minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. §3B1.2? | Gruezo was accountable only for charged conduct; his crewmember role was significant and not minor. | He was a lesser participant compared with the master and uncharged organizers and thus a minor participant. | Affirmed — De Varon bars considering uncharged conduct; record supports denial of minor-role reduction. |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Cabezas-Montano, 949 F.3d 567 (11th Cir. 2020) (government burden to prove MDLEA jurisdiction)
- United States v. Iguaran, 821 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2016) (standard for jurisdictional stipulations and review)
- United States v. De Varon, 175 F.3d 930 (11th Cir. 1999) (role reduction cannot be based on uncharged conduct)
- United States v. Campbell, 743 F.3d 802 (11th Cir. 2014) (MDLEA extraterritorial reach and nexus not required)
- United States v. Rioseco, 845 F.2d 299 (11th Cir. 1988) (Coast Guard boardings normally non-custodial for Miranda purposes)
- United States v. Cavallo, 790 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2015) (deference to district court credibility findings)
- United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987) (facial-challenge standard)
- United States v. Castillo, 899 F.3d 1208 (11th Cir. 2018) (guilty plea waives certain pre-plea constitutional challenges)
- United States v. Valois, 915 F.3d 717 (11th Cir. 2019) (factors for denying minor-role reduction)
- United States v. Mena, 863 F.2d 1522 (11th Cir. 1989) (rejecting vagueness challenge to predecessor statute)
