History
  • No items yet
midpage
625 F.3d 1148
9th Cir.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Leal-Felix, a previously deported Mexican citizen, reentered the U.S. in 2009 and pleaded guilty to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
  • Plea agreement restrained sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range, based on total offense level 9 and calculated criminal history.
  • Probation calculated his criminal history at 14 points, including prior burglary (2001) and methamphetamine import (2008).
  • Two points were added for two traffic violations (Nov 17, 1998 and Nov 19, 1998) with concurrent 180-day county jail sentences and 36 months probation.
  • District court sentenced Leal-Felix to 21 months, at the low end of a 21–27 month range, with Criminal History Category VI.
  • On appeal, Leal-Felix challenged whether traffic citations constitute intervening arrests under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2); district court’s calculation otherwise stood.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a traffic citation counts as an arrest under § 4A1.2(a)(2). Leal-Felix argues citations are not arrests and thus should not add points. The government argues citations are arrests in federal parlance, citing Morgan and related authority. Affirmed; citations can be treated as arrests for criminal history purposes.
Whether the 2007 amendment to § 4A1.2(a)(2) eliminates Morgan's rationale. Morgan is persuasive and Morgan’s rationale should be rejected; Citations not included. Amendment removed relatedness/recidivism concerns; Morgan's reasoning remains persuasive on interpretation. Affirmed; the district court properly counted citations as arrests under the guidelines.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d 507 (9th Cir. 2009) (guidelines interpretation and de novo review of sentencing rulings)
  • United States v. Morgan, 354 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2003) (traffic stop as an arrest; recidivism counting)
  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1996) (traffic stop purpose; federal parlance of arrest)
  • Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1984) (citation vs arrest distinction in traffic stops)
  • Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1998) (citation of speeding stop; brief non-custodial detention)
  • United States v. Cruz-Gramajo, 570 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2009) (guide to plain meaning and structure of guidelines)
  • United States v. Treadwell, 593 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (plain meaning controls when text unambiguous)
  • United States v. Joseph, 50 F.3d 401 (7th Cir. 1995) (early view on interpreting 'arrest' under guidelines)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Leal-Felix
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 1, 2010
Citations: 625 F.3d 1148; 2010 WL 4273363; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22671; No. 09-50426
Docket Number: No. 09-50426
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Leal-Felix, 625 F.3d 1148