United States v. Lamar Tucker
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24667
| 7th Cir. | 2013Background
- Police searched 2950 West Harrison St., Apartment 502, with a warrant; Tucker was not present.
- Officers found a Sears Roebuck rifle under a mattress in the apartment; documents bearing Tucker’s name were recovered.
- Additional items included $237 cash, eight bags of heroin in a potato chip bag, and ammunition.
- Tucker was apprehended nearby; during a post-arrest interview he said he was holding the gun for a friend.
- Tucker was charged with possessing a firearm after a felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); defense argued lack of substantial connection to the apartment and fabrication of admissions.
- At trial, Tucker presented testimony from Vanessa Tucker and Tequillia Williams to show he did not live in the apartment; an officer testified Vanessa pointed to Tucker’s room when asked which bedroom was his.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for constructive possession | Tucker admitted holding for a friend; sufficient to prove possession. | Ownership/possession tied to residence; defense credibility undermines link to apartment. | Sufficient evidence supported constructive possession. |
| Effect of admitting Tucker's prior felonies | Admission of six felonies could prejudice Tucker. | Admission would preclude a fair trial; Tucker did not testify. | Claim waived; conviction affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Morris, 576 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2009) (insurmountable hurdle for sufficiency review)
- United States v. Pulido, 69 F.3d 192 (7th Cir. 1995) (standard for insufficiency review)
- United States v. Warren, 593 F.3d 540 (7th Cir. 2010) (sufficiency review framework; light most favorable to government)
- United States v. Caldwell, 423 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2005) (elements of § 922(g)(1) possession case)
- United States v. Bloch, 718 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2013) (admission of statements can prove possession)
- United States v. Kelly, 519 F.3d 355 (7th Cir. 2008) (credibility determinations of testimonial evidence)
