History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Kenneth Watford
692 F. App'x 108
| 4th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Kenneth Watford was convicted on multiple counts including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire and attempted wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and access device fraud (some counts during pretrial release).
  • Government alleged Watford used corporations and stolen identities to purchase vehicles and obtain insurance certificates; coconspirator statements and physical evidence linked Watford to the BMW 750LI and identity documents.
  • Police found identity- and credit-related documents in the BMW and at Watford’s residence; Watford rented a storage unit and police obtained a warrant to search it.
  • Watford moved to sever certain counts, sought recusal of the district judge, moved to suppress the storage-unit evidence, contested sufficiency of evidence for Counts 1–6, and challenged the sentence loss calculation.
  • The Fourth Circuit affirmed: joinder and denial of severance proper, recusal denied, suppression motion denied (probable cause and nexus upheld), sufficiency of evidence for conspiracy and aggravated identity theft upheld, and any sentencing loss-calculation error was harmless.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Government) Defendant's Argument (Watford) Held
Joinder / Severance of Counts 9–12 with 1–6 Joinder proper under Rule 8(a); offenses related and part of same scheme Misjoinder and prejudice required severance under Rule 14 Initial joinder proper; denial of severance not an abuse of discretion (no specific showing of prejudice)
Judicial Recusal No disqualifying bias; judge’s remarks were ordinary judicial frustration Judge’s comments and prior litigation with Watford required recusal Denial of recusal affirmed; comments were not a basis for disqualification under Liteky and §455(a)
Suppression: search warrant for storage unit Affidavit established probable cause and nexus (documents, coconspirator statements, items found in car/home) Affidavit lacked sufficient nexus and contained deficiencies/errors Warrant supported: probable cause and reasonable nexus established; suppression denial affirmed
Sufficiency of evidence for Counts 1–6 Trial evidence (coconspirator testimony, documents, admissions) proved conspiracy and identity theft elements Evidence insufficient to prove conspiracy, wire fraud counts, and identity theft Sufficient evidence for Count 1 (conspiracy) and Count 6 (aggravated identity theft); challenges to other counts waived for inadequate briefing
Sentencing: intended-loss calculation Loss > $400,000 but < $1,000,000 supported; any guideline error would be harmless District court miscalculated intended loss affecting guideline range Any error was harmless: court would have imposed the same 135-month sentence and addressed §3553(a) factors

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. McLaurin, 764 F.3d 372 (4th Cir.) (Rule 8 review standard)
  • United States v. Hornsby, 666 F.3d 296 (4th Cir.) (standard for denial of severance)
  • United States v. Rhodes, 32 F.3d 867 (4th Cir.) (severance standard)
  • Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994) (bench demeanor and impartiality standard for recusal)
  • United States v. Whorley, 550 F.3d 326 (4th Cir.) (recusal standard of review)
  • United States v. Abramski, 706 F.3d 307 (4th Cir.) (standard of review for suppression factual findings)
  • United States v. Patiutka, 804 F.3d 684 (4th Cir.) (probable cause and reasonable belief standard)
  • United States v. Doyle, 650 F.3d 460 (4th Cir.) (nexus by nature of items and normal inferences)
  • United States v. Howard, 773 F.3d 519 (4th Cir.) (sufficiency review standard)
  • United States v. Kuhrt, 788 F.3d 403 (5th Cir.) (elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud)
  • United States v. Adepoju, 756 F.3d 250 (4th Cir.) (elements of aggravated identity theft)
  • Eriline Co. S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648 (4th Cir.) (failure to adequately brief an argument results in waiver)
  • In re Taylor, 417 F.3d 649 (7th Cir.) (prior litigation with judge does not mandate recusal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Kenneth Watford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 19, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 108
Docket Number: 15-4637
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.