History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Joshua Green
835 F.3d 844
| 8th Cir. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On Jan. 30, 2012, a methamphetamine buy at Hayes’s residence escalated into a shootout; Green and Hayes fired guns, victims were wounded, and firearms/ammunition were later recovered.
  • Journigan (middleman) and others testified about Green bringing four bundles of methamphetamine into Hayes’s home that day and that Green and Hayes held Journigan at gunpoint.
  • Law enforcement executed a consent search of Green’s residence (Feb. 2, 2012) and recovered multiple firearms, phones, a laptop, scales, baggies, and ~7 grams of methamphetamine from bags in an air vent; additional ammunition and clothing were found elsewhere.
  • Phones and a computer seized in 2012 were not searched until May 2014; the government obtained a warrant and produced results about one week before trial; the district court excluded some inculpatory electronic evidence as a discovery sanction but admitted limited material.
  • Green and Hayes were convicted after a joint trial of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine (21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846), and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) counts for possessing/brandishing/discharging firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime; Hayes also convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (felon in possession).

Issues

Issue Appellants' Argument Government's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for methamphetamine conspiracy Jury’s special verdict (finding <50 g) shows conviction rested only on ~7 g found at Green’s house after shootout; evidence doesn’t link that 7 g to the charged conspiracy and appellants withdrew at shootout Evidence of pre-Jan.30 conspiracy, Green bringing meth into Hayes’s home that day, and trafficking indicia at Green’s home support conspiracy; quantity finding affects sentencing range only Affirmed. Evidence, viewed favorably to verdict, was sufficient; withdrawal not established and quantity finding does not negate conspiracy conviction.
Sufficiency of evidence for Hayes’s § 922(g) (felon in possession) Hayes lacked proof of knowing possession of the Ruger 9mm Receipt for 9mm ammo on Hayes, eyewitness testimony of guns displayed at home, empty Ruger box in plain view, and other corroboration support constructive possession Affirmed. Reasonable jury could find Hayes had dominion/control over the firearm.
Motion to suppress / discovery violation (delayed search of phones/computer; Rule 16) Continued government possession and late search violated Fourth Amendment and discovery rules; suppression/exclusion required Government conceded delay was error, but obtained warrant and produced results; district court excluded some material as sanction and admitted limited items; any Fourth Amendment error was harmless given independent evidence Affirmed. Any Fourth Amendment error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; district court did not abuse discretion in discovery sanctions.
Denial of jury instruction on justification defense Appellants sought to present self-defense/justification (for shootings) Government: justification not available/unsupported; even if available, appellants failed to meet elements (e.g., did not avoid reckless placement in danger, had alternatives like calling police) Affirmed. No adequate evidentiary foundation for instruction; defendants failed to show required elements.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. White, 816 F.3d 976 (8th Cir.) (standard for sufficiency review)
  • United States v. Rolon-Ramos, 502 F.3d 750 (8th Cir.) (drug-quantity is not an essential element of conspiracy)
  • Smith v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 714 (2013) (withdrawal does not negate conspiracy offense; conspiracy is continuing)
  • United States v. Zimmer, 299 F.3d 710 (8th Cir.) (requirements to establish withdrawal from conspiracy)
  • United States v. Shepard, 462 F.3d 847 (8th Cir.) (withdrawal requires affirmative action; not mere cessation)
  • United States v. Poe, 442 F.3d 1101 (8th Cir.) (elements required to assert justification defense in firearms cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Joshua Green
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 31, 2016
Citation: 835 F.3d 844
Docket Number: 15-1734, 15-1737
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.