History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Joseph Yengel, Jr.
711 F.3d 392
4th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Sergeant Staton responded to a domestic assault call at Yengel's home; Yengel was arrested and removed from the residence amid possible armed threat.
  • Sergeant Staton learned from witnesses that a grenade might be inside the house; no immediate evacuation or explosive expert involvement occurred.
  • Sergeant Staton directed Mrs. Yengel to open a locked guest-bedroom closet and permitted entry without a warrant or immediate evacuation.
  • Staton pried open the locked closet with a screwdriver and discovered firearms and what he believed to be a grenade-containing device.
  • Explosives experts later found only shotgun powder and a timer device inside the closet after a three-and-a-half-hour scene; Yengel was charged with possession of an unregistered firearm.
  • The district court suppressed the warrantless closet search as unconstitutional; the government appealed seeking reversal of that suppression.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether exigent circumstances justified the warrantless closet search Government argues emergency existed due to grenade threat Yengel contends no exigency justified warrantless entry No exigency; search suppressed

Key Cases Cited

  • Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006) (recognizes emergency exception to warrant requirement for certain home entries)
  • Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 (1978) (exigency as justification for warrantless home entry)
  • Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 (1999) (warrantless entry must be narrowly tailored to exigency)
  • United States v. Turner, 650 F.2d 526 (1981) (Turner factors for assessing exigency: urgency, destruction, danger, knowledge, destructibility)
  • Mora v. City of Gaithersburg, 519 F.3d 216 (2008) (preventive action as exigency when threat to public safety is substantial)
  • United States v. Hill, 649 F.3d 258 (2011) (Fourth Circuit framework for exigent circumstances; reliance on objective facts)
  • United States v. Whitehorn, 813 F.2d 646 (1987) (protective search; no evacuation or explicit risk shown on scene)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Joseph Yengel, Jr.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 15, 2013
Citation: 711 F.3d 392
Docket Number: 12-4317
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.