History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Jones
4:20-cr-00209
M.D. Penn.
Jan 13, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Indictment (Aug. 27, 2020): Jones charged with possession of a firearm with an altered/obliterated serial number in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(k); maximum penalty five years.
  • Procedural posture: Detained after initial hearing and a September 25, 2020 detention order; Jones filed a second motion for release Dec. 6, 2020; hearing held Dec. 18, 2020 and new home study obtained.
  • Defendant: Born Mar. 9, 2002; recently turned 18; juvenile history includes two juvenile dispositions and probation for a firearms-related offense from Nov. 7, 2019.
  • Government proffers (found clear and convincing): controlled purchase of heroin/fentanyl from Jones (Nov. 7, 2019); recorded calls and other evidence tying Jones to an Aug. 1, 2020 Williamsport shootout, discussions of acquiring and moving firearms, and recovery of a .38 on Aug. 16, 2020 believed to be the shooting weapon.
  • Release proposal: My Vision 9 Foundation would provide apartment housing, employment at a nursery with transportation, daily mentor meetings, and supervision/curfew monitoring; Probation’s home study found the residence suitable.
  • Holding: Court concluded no condition or combination of conditions would reasonably assure community safety and ordered continued detention pending trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Jones should be released pretrial under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 Jones is a danger to the community based on controlled buy, recorded calls linking him to a shootout, firearm movement, and ongoing investigation Jones is young, has limited juvenile history, and My Vision 9 offers housing, employment, mentorship, and supervision that could mitigate risk Denied — court found government proffers clear and convincing and no conditions would assure community safety
Weight/reliability of government proffers Recorded calls and corroborating evidence will show Jones’s involvement in gun violence and firearms possession/movement Jones did not substantively refute the proffers at hearing Court credited the government’s proffers as clear and convincing evidence
Sufficiency of the proposed community-based release plan (My Vision 9) Plan insufficient to offset the demonstrated danger from alleged firearm/gang activity Program would provide immediate housing, steady employment, daily mentorship, transportation, and curfew monitoring Court found the program promising but concluded Jones was not shown to be willing/ready to follow its guidance; plan insuficient to assure community safety
Conditions of confinement (COVID-related near-solitary) Government did not base detention decision on detention conditions Jones argued current jail conditions (23.5 hrs/day isolation) were harsh and supported release Court acknowledged conditions but held they do not outweigh the safety concerns; detention continued

Key Cases Cited

  • None cited in the opinion.
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jones
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 13, 2021
Citation: 4:20-cr-00209
Docket Number: 4:20-cr-00209
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Penn.