History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Jonathan Cashaw
625 F.3d 271
5th Cir.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Cashaw was arrested with his associate during a drug operation at a home within 1,000 feet of a middle school; 106.15 g crack cocaine and related drug paraphernalia were found.
  • He was charged with aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute at least 50 g of crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and pleaded guilty.
  • The PSR recommended a base offense level of 30, then career offender status under § 4B1.1 due to prior felonies, yielding an alternate offense level of 34 and a career-offender offense level of 37.
  • With a criminal history category of VI, the PSR proposed a range of 262 to 327 months’ imprisonment under the Guidelines.
  • At sentencing, Cashaw claimed a minor participant adjustment under § 3B1.2; the district court rejected this, holding that the career offender provision precluded any such downward adjustment, and sentenced Cashaw to 290 months.
  • The court affirmed on review, applying the Guidelines sequence and holding that minor participant adjustment cannot be applied to the career offender provision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a minor participant adjustment can be applied to the career offender provisions Cashaw argues the minor participant adjustment should apply The district court and guidelines sequence preclude the adjustment No; minor participant adjustment not allowed with career offender provision
Whether the Guidelines sequence supports applying adjustments after determining career offender status Cashaw contends sequence allows post-career-offender adjustments Guidelines require career offender adjustment before Chapter Three adjustments except for acceptance of responsibility Yes; sequence precludes Chapter Three adjustments after § 4B1.1(a)–(b); district court correct

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Morales–Diaz, 925 F.2d 535 (1st Cir. 1991) (career-offender sequencing and adjustments)
  • United States v. Perez, 328 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2003) (career offender adjustments and minor participation)
  • United States v. Johnson, 155 F.3d 682 (3d Cir. 1998) (limitations on adjustments under career offender)
  • United States v. Jeppeson, 333 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2003) (explicitly discusses adjustments after career-offender status)
  • United States v. Jeter, 329 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir. 2003) (per curiam on career-offender sequencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jonathan Cashaw
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 2, 2010
Citation: 625 F.3d 271
Docket Number: 09-51035
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.