History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Johnson
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22072
| 7th Cir. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Two-count cocaine base distribution conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) after a two-day trial.
  • Government relied on confidential informant, two officers, recordings, and a brother who testified about prior crack transactions.
  • Informant was strip-searched, equipped with recording devices, and paid by police; he later returned with crack cocaine.
  • Video and audio recordings allegedly showing Johnson meeting informant and handling drugs; informant testified to arrangements and purchases.
  • Defense emphasized lack of explicit money/drug exchange in videos and attacked informant’s and brother’s credibility; challenged admissibility of prior acts and jail-recordings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admission of jail calls and 2007 conviction Johnson objected; government argues relevance for consciousness of guilt Recordings unfairly prejudicial; prior conviction improper propensity evidence No reversible error; evidence admitted as harmless
Prior drug sales evidence admissibility Evidence valid under Rule 404(b) with notice Propensity evidence; improper without trial objection Harmless error; conviction stands
Prior law enforcement contact evidence Officer testimony offered to show familiarity with target Prejudicial mug-shot-like reference Not reversible; error harmless under standard
Jail telephone recordings as threats or consciousness evidence Videos show consciousness of guilt; relevant to threats Recordings may mislead; potential prejudice Court did not abuse discretion; probative value outweighs prejudice
Sentence within guidelines vs downward departure Guideline range appropriate given career offender status Lifetime of trauma merits substantial downwards departure District court did not abuse discretion; 300-month sentence affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Owens v. United States, 424 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2005) (plain-error review for evidentiary errors; miscarriage of justice standard)
  • Sebolt v. United States, 460 F.3d 910 (7th Cir. 2006) (plain-error standard for unobjected evidence)
  • Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1976) (prison attire at trial; prejudice considerations)
  • United States v. Simmons, 581 F.3d 582 (7th Cir. 2009) (mug-shot reference in closing argument; harmless error when corrected promptly)
  • Calabrese v. United States, 572 F.3d 362 (7th Cir. 2009) (consciousness-of-guilt evidence from jail calls; admissibility depends on probative value)
  • United States v. Owens, 424 F.3d 649 (7th Cir. 2005) (harmless-error and actual miscarriage of justice standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Johnson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Oct 26, 2010
Citation: 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22072
Docket Number: 09-3558
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.